It is written in the rules of court that a pleading must not contain the evidence by which the facts alleged in it are to be proved. Does that mean a petitioner can distort/lie and get away with it. An alleged fact might not have ever happened. To disprove it a respondent would have to commence an expensive legal exercise.
Or a fact's proportionality was ridiculous: an outlier.
Lawyer's wordsmithing at its finest: Paragraph 6. Mr. Walker purportedly signed a Representation Agreement. The implication of which is that I forged such a document making me the representative for health care. VCHA neglected to say that the document was prepared by a lawyer although they had contacted the lawyer to determine if in fact he had prepared the Representation Agreement. This is dangerous speak as what happens if a Petition is put in front of a judge like what happened to me, it creates an impression that I am a "scalet woman." Anything to discredit me.
And when it was discovered that I had a Will naming me beneficiary of Randy's estate, the legality of the Will was questioned. The Will was executed in 2008.
Defamation in pleadings are not actionable. I am not sure maybe they could be or should be.
Gone ballistic scenarios. Activist by default. audreyjlaferriere@gmail.com phone: 604-321-2276,do not leave voice mail http://voiceofgoneballistic.blogspot.com 207-5524 Cambie Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 3A2 Everything posted I believe to be true. If not, please let me know.