Do we need a registry of those under the Adult Guardianship Act.

 I asked IA why is it that the public has the right to know who is jail but the public does not have the right to know who is under the BC Adult Guardianship Act.

That is a good question. The answer may depend on different perspectives and values, but I can provide some possible explanations based on the information I found on the web.

One possible explanation is that the names of those who are in jail are public because they have been convicted of a crime and their identity is relevant to the administration of justice and the protection of society. The names of those who have been certified as incapable under the Adult Guardianship Act are private because they have not committed any offence and their identity is not related to any public interest or safety issue. Their privacy and dignity may outweigh the need for transparency in their case.

Another possible explanation is that the names of those who are in jail are public because they have the right to appeal their conviction and sentence, and the public has the right to know the outcome of their case. The names of those who have been certified as incapable under the Adult Guardianship Act are private because they have limited or no legal capacity to challenge or consent to their guardianship, and the public has no legitimate interest or right to interfere with their personal affairs.

There may be other reasons or arguments for or against the disclosure of the names of those who are in jail or those who are under guardianship. Ultimately, the decision to make the names public or private is based on the law and the court's discretion, which may vary depending on the circumstances of each case.

If a government agency can relocate an adult without a registry then we have no security of person in Canada. How many people have disappeared in BC.  The AGA is worse than the Mental Health Act.

PS December 15, 2023.  Is privacy used to hide corruption (not doing the right thing) by the health authorities (government).  Not knowing what happens to citizens is mental abuse/torture.  Once a person's rights are taken away from them by way of the AGA or by an individual by way of a representation agreement, it is no longer a private matter.  The affected person is being sold into slavery.  I want my neighbour to know if the state hasrelocated me.  The reasoning that someone might exploit me is ridiculous.  I want my neighbour to know so he can help me.  

Representation Agreements for health care in BC

 I am trying to learn about the history of Representation Agreements in BC.  They must be someone but I have not been able to find out if there is anyone totally conversant with a RA.  I want to know what are the downsides of a Representation Agreement.  Appointing a person you trust is a daunting task.  In fact I would say it is impossible.  Blatant abuse screams out by letting an inexperienced person make decisions for health care and where a person can live.  

Maya Kowalski sobs as verdict is reached in trial

Waldemar's American Road Trip: Big Dreams, Big Art | Made In The USA: Fu...

Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood

 I recently came across this song "Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood."  It is exactly what I feel has happened to me in my sojourn to understand what happened to me because I only wanted to be with my husband when he was ill and VCH refused to accommodate us.  There was never any suggestion that I abused my husband so I do not know what the problem was. It just escalated into a reverse SLAP suit where everyone was afraid.  I suspect it is over the perceived power that VCH might have over the lives of their children and grandchildren.  As bizarre as it was and still is.  It is even worse now with all this politically correct wokeness. As I search for answers, I feel that I have been purpled dotted by those that can offer answers but prefer not to. 

From my post 20 March 2014: the PGT knew Randy was dying and it would not intervene so I could see him. They instead revoked my enduring power of attorney and section 9 representation agreement.

 

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Randy Sick

Audrey Laferriere audreyjlaferriere@gmail.com	7:54 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Romilda, Tanvirezohra

I understand Randy is feeling better today so I want to see him at the curbside at 1:30 pm.  I also want a written statement given to me of his vitals on each day from now on. I will attend at the curbside each day to get it. If I cannot see him at the crubside each day then I want access to his bedside as he may be dying as it takes only a short time for a fever to pitch and cause death.
 You have a mother in extended care, how would you feel if you couldn't see her.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I got an email from Ro Ang yesterday that said I could not see Randy at the curbside i.e. off GPC property because Randy had a temperature and she won't let Randy see me.  Randy always has a fever it is part of his base line after his accident.  I replied and said  if Randy has a fever that he can't get out of bed and be transported to the curbside (off GPC property) then I want to see him at his bedside. No response.  Dr. Dunne signs an affidavit saying Randy has plateaued and now Randy is too sick because of a low grade fever to see me.

In any event I went to the sidewalk in front of GPC with a sign that I was banned from seeing Randy who is dying by GPC because staff is afraid of me.  I was hoping that staff or someone would be a witness and tell Ro that this isn't true.

As for our friend Kevin the security guard with a title he is writing policy for VCH.his report says that he interviewed only eight people:
.
Romilda Ang, Manager George Pearson Centre
Tanvireozohra Battawala, Resident CARE COODINATOR GEORGE Person Centre
Karen Marshall, Paladin Security Officer, George Pearson Centre
Bob Van Uytfanck, Paladin Security Officer, Supervisor George Pearson Centre
Richard Singleton, Director Risk Management, Vancovuer Community
Terru Asj. :ead Cpprdomatpr. Omtegrated {rptectopm Servoces. Vancouver Copastal Health
Dr. George Nemetz, Private Psychologist, Critical Incident Stress Debrief Facilator
Sam Greenspoon, Social Worker (George Person C

Officer Marshall described Ms. Laferriere as extremely upset and observed her attempting to "hot or run over" staff with Mr. Walker's electronic wheelchair.  Clinicial staff atttempted to stop Ms. Laferriere from holding Mr. Walker's wheelchair.  This from a professional observer who should have known that I and Randy had the right to leave George Pearson Centre at anytime.  She as well as the rest of the mob assaulted me and imprisoned Randy and me.  But then Kevin's report doesn't say anything about that.

NOTE:  Randy does not have an electronic wheelchair which I agree could be used as a dangerous vehicle considering how heavy these wheelchairs are.  They twist everything.  The point is they created the situation not me.  And this whole thing has nothing to do with what happened on October 22, 2013, it has everything to do with the fact that management doesn't want me near the hospital so I can report on any medical misadventures like putinig DNRs on residents without their knowledge or reporting that the heart monitor machines were not calibrated thereby causing risk a real risk to Randy and other patients.  They want to cover up everything because he may die at anytime and GPC doesn't have the staff to monitor him continuously or even the skill as to how hat they would do if his heart rate reached over 155 again.  They are not experienced in agressive resuscitation or have cardiac drugs to lower his heart rate.  I asked that they have a nurse 24/7 with him but they refused and they also refuse to have me be at his bedside.  They are cruel and another medical adventure is waiting to happen to Randy.

It was Kevin  who put the words into Richard Singleton's letter to deny me access to Randy:

1.  all questions from Mrs. Laferriere should be directed to the Resident Care Coordinator (rather than to the nurses who nurse Randy).
2.  Two staff present when interacting with Ms. Laferriere (what a joke, suggesting that I attack the nurses)
3.  Priorize staff safety (Staff have always been safe except when they broke the law and caused violence  October 22 2013 incident wherein the staff attacked me and Randy).
4.  Call 911 or security for support as appropriate (It has always been me who phoned 911 to protect Randy's rights from unlawful confinement)
5. Specific visiting hours and he later he says I should never be allowed on VCH property so how can I visit Randy
6.  Not to go beyond Mr. Walker's rooom (considering they moved him to a ward, he doesn't have a room)
7.  Not to visit other residents or family at GPC (I have been prevented free speech and association).  There is no affidavits from any resident, family, or staff to say that they agree with this.

All these recommendations are contained in the two letters that Richard Singleton wrote me. And as soon as I learn how to scan them I will post them.

Chinese Doctors, nurses & medical sectors are in panic/Crackdown on corruption. Mostly because of private hospitals.

Decision in Dr Jordan Peterson Freedom of Expression case

That makes no sense.

 How I see the system

from a prisoner:

“But that makes no sense,” I wanted to say, but didn’t. After my time in the system I no longer expected anything to make sense."

The Dirty War on Britain's NHS (Free Healthcare Scandal Documentary) | R...

So You Want To Take My License?

Do you have privacy if you are dead

 According to the constitution, we have the right to life, liberty and security of person.  If a person is dead or declared a non-person, that person has no right to privacy.   Once you are dead, you no longer need security of person. 

Thus, if a person is physically dead or is a non-person (civil death) then there would be no reason for agencies like the public guardian and trustee not to share contact information.  I want to know if my neighbour is vulnerable.

And, once a person is said to be incapable under an enduring power of attorney and/or a section 9 representation agreement, the person is civilly dead and he has no right to privacy. 

The banks monitor their clients for abuse and so should neighbours.  

I would like to know if my neighbour has agency.  A non-person cannot make a contract.  

My definition of "neighbour" means globally.  

With privacy comes the death of historians:  how can history be written without access to information.

Court Ordered Committee or Committee by Certificate of Incapability

 I find the Court Ordered Committee and Committee by Certificate of Incapability very confusing.

It seems that a Court Ordered Committee has transparency, but the Certificate of Incapability does not.

There is something inherently wrong with the Certificate of Incapability process.  It reminds me of the process the Star Chamber Courts followed in England centuries ago.  Decisions were made in secrecy without due process and with no appeal. The tribunal was allowed to torture an accused but not kill him, much like giving morphine to a patient but not killing him.  But if you torture an accused too much or if you give a patient too much morphine, they will die.  

The Public Guardian and Trustee does an investigation, makes a recommendation, sends it to a health authority designate (an employee of VCHA), and after reading the recommendation, the HAD signs the certificate, probably from the bottom of his "to-do list." The subjected person becomes a nonperson, and the Public Guardian and Trustee becomes the committee of this now nonperson who before was a person. What happens to the nonperson if he was relocated...I do not know, and there is no way for the public to know, as such information is confidential.

Under privacy, the public is not entitled to know.  In New Zealand, identifying those under guardianship is against the law.  And the person elected cannot identify himself. And the press is gagged. It must be the same in British Columbia. These evils must be replicated in other jurisdictions.  

I remember when Randy, my husband, was being relocated by VGH to a long care facility, no one at VCH would tell me what happened to him.  I still remember the terror of not knowing. From the day of his accident and for six months, I visited Randy every day. Never had a problem.  When I approached the nursing station, the eight nurses at the nursing station looked down at me as if they enjoyed watching me being in a state of confusion and terror. Not one of them broke rank and told me.  And they all knew. Again it was privacy.  It was against policy to tell where a patient was being transferred to. The nurses did not tell me that it was a privacy/policy thing. It was cruel. And what would have happened to anyone of them if one of them told me. Nothing. The absurdity of privacy.  It harms.  It does not protect. It isolates.  It drove me to the edge of madness.

My mind went back to the first time I spoke with a social worker at VGH, it was the end of her shift, and she was in a hurry to leave.  Her words to me were to forget about Randy as they would look after him. And she ran out the door. Who were they? And who was she? From that moment on, I became inwardly afraid but I did not know why. The social worker's foregone conclusion was based on arrogant stupidity. Later I learned that a social worker is an officer of the court, and I was right to be apprehensive.

No privacy when you are a non-person (incapable)

 When the state decides that a person is incapable, thus making the person a non-person, I want to know who that person is. That person has to be protected by the community at large.

 A non-person is a person that has no rights. Alluding that a non-person has rights is a fiction. It is a civil death. 

And according to common law, a non-person has no right to privacy, so there is no reason not to publish their names.  

-----

Why the public guardian and trustee should publish names of those that are incapable

 How would anyone know if a person is incapable to contract (have agency) unless there is a register published by the Public Guardian and Trustee available to the public.  

Adult Guardianship Act BC

Transfer of property by incapable adult

60.2   (1)If an adult transfers an interest in the adult's property while the adult is incapable, the transfer is voidable against the adult unless

(a)the interest was transferred for full and valuable consideration, and that consideration was actually paid or secured to the adult, or

(b)at the time of the transfer, a reasonable person would not have known that the adult was incapable.

(2)In a proceeding in respect of a transfer described in subsection (1), the onus of proving a matter described in subsection (1) (b) is on the person to whom the interest was transferred.

Guardianship: Life under the hidden control of the Public Trustee system in Australia.

Privacy again

This past week I spoke with two persons who like me had troubles with the health authorities a decade ago. Each of us experienced trauma because Vancouver Health Authority would not share information with us.  If the health authority thinks you are discrediting them, there is no help. Not from the media, not from physicians, not from advocacy organizations, nothing.  A reporter told they would not run my story as I would be harmed. If you have no money for lawyers, then they will show you the door.  And if you have money, they take your money until you have none and then show you the door.  Resources are limited and the law deters to the health authorities. Think a trusted person would never molest a child.  At the end you only have regret and silent anger. The pattern of their behavior is so obvious, like they are following a flow chart.  When my litigation was dismissed because my lawyer did not follow the rules, and I could not represent myself; the lawyers for VCH et al, all rejoiced in the courtroom leaving me bewildered. And the judge did not condemn them for their mal behavior.But then in her hurried departure, maybe she did not notice. Neither did she entertain my plea for an adjournment. Granting an adjournment would not have been necessary if the litigators for the health authority et al would have consented.  Why would VCHA want the litigation dismissed. You would think they would welcome transparency and an open forum. 

  

Relocation by the State

Stats re those that have been involutarily taken (Mental Health Act).

 "Further, of those 1,468 patient files, only 471 contained a Notification to Near Relative (Form 16). This is a compliance rate of about 32 percent. In other words, based on the information provided to us, the parents, siblings, children or other near relatives of 997 involuntary patients admitted in British Columbia in June 2017 did not receive the required formal notice that their family member had been involuntarily admitted or, importantly, the information about that person’s right to challenge their detention."   

Why

Why should you do the right thing when you do not have to.

The answer is within

Listen to "Your Consent is Not Required with Rob Wipond Part 2" 

Confidentially of patients at VCHA is a joke ...

 This is the contents of an email I wrote

Audrey Laferriere <audreyjlaferriere@gmail.com>	Oct 28, 2020, 4:32 PM		Reply
to manuel

From GPC:

The minutes from the September 10 2019 meeting of the residents' council for the George Pearson Centre give us a further example of the indignity of living in a congregative institution.  The second item of business from the manager's report is a notice regarding Do No Resuscitate Orders.  DNRS tags have been "affixed" to the back of the wheelchairs of those residents who agreed to a Do Not Resuscitate Order.  DNRs are personal health-care decisions.  Having them located on the back of your wheelchair means that everyone you come into contact with including strangers, will know one of the most personal decisions you have made.  Institutional life strips you of your dignity, your rights and your autonomy.  You are reduced to a DNR tag on the back of a wheelchair.

Missing in Action - clients of PGT

 I do not understand why the public cannot access who are the "clients" of the Public Guardian and Trustee in British Columbia.  Not only can "clients" go into hiding, the PGT does not have to tell anyone that a "client" is even a "client."  Privacy does not cut it. The PGT can literally take you off the street and disappear you. That is medieval.  That is North Korean. That has to change. I have the right to know what happened to my neighbour. 

How can such deaths be lost by legislation. This oversite goes to Rocco Galati and his retelling of current Canadian history (see In Conversation with Rocco Galati May 10 2023 on librti.com).  

- https://librti.com/view-video/in-conversation-with-rocco-galata-may-10-23

The Reason for Almost All Mental Illnesses - Prof. Jordan Peterson (litigation causes complexity)

Risk Management

In my quest to understand what happened to me, I asked Vancouver Health Authority particulars of those that work for the Department of Risk Management. Those that bully are always part of a group and every group has a leader. I did not expect their names although it would seem appropriate but they could have sent me the number that are employed in the department and their education/experience.  Specifically, I wanted to know how many had psychology degrees.  I was driven to the extreme edge of madness and I want to know why.  If you want to control someone you gaslight her and slowly watch her come apart.  Those that designed the militaristic torture policies for the USA all had advanced degrees in psychology. 

 Everyone that works for a health authority should have a public bio of who they are. 

We the public are thrown into a den of lions when we try to advocate for the injured and sick and we do not know by whom. 

In 2010 VGH had blasted on its walls its policy of "Mean Management" and I also asked for particulars on this policy and nothing.  

edgeofmadness 2

Yesterday afternoon I was searching for information on the BC Privacy Act It was a frustrating rabbit hole to manipulate No resolution there This morning at 5:00 am I woke up to listening to a YouTube podcast (playlist) about privacy issues This isn't the first time this weirdness has happened I would search something on google (I never searched for it on YouTube) and I wake up hearing a podcast, specifically the part that I was interested/confused about.I can't sleep unless I have noise in the background The voices distract me so I can defocus from my everyday problems that were on my mind and fall asleep It must be some AI thing. Google must be hooked up to YouTube And it has the power to wake me in mid night The best I can tell is that the government should only be legislating privacy laws for the public interest (national security) and not for the interests of private or corporate individuals.  Private and corporate individuals as a means to do business can have their own privacy policies.  

edgeofmadness.me

Since social media is going crazy with posts being deleted, I have decided to duplicate my posts on a new website. I have reserved the name: edgeofmadness.me The name was inspired from Dr. Jordan Peterson when he described his experiences with dealing with his litigations. He said they drove him to the "edge of madness." I went past the edge of madness as I did not have a battery of lawyers, or money, or family, or colleagues, or inside knowlege to support me like Dr. Peterson had. And I was thirty years older than him. I was on my own trying to cope while suffering from acute PTSD. It was untenable. I went to revist the definition of what "doubling down" meant. It means to agressively go after someone. Thank you Joel Morris, the lead litigator, for the Canadian Medical Physicians Association, for threatening me. Since I really did not know what Joel meant at the time, technically I should not describe it as a threat.

Testing to see if posts show up

Testing

Equality and the courts

I keep thinking about equality. One thing I know for sure is that there is no equality in the courts. If each party to a litigation has a lawyer then the process might be defined as being equal. But what about those that do not have a lawyer. How could that even remotely be considered equal. I am advocating that no one should be allowed in a higher court like the supreme court or appeal court unless they are represented by a lawyer. Then equality will be a bit more equal.

Fox News Threatens Tucker Carlson: We'll Release The Texts That Got You ...

Why David Bell would not give me copies of "irrelevant" documents ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/business/media/tucker-carlson-dominion-fox-news.html?smid=url-share

When are emails not relevant.

I was told by David Bell, lawyer for the Vancouver Health Authority, that emails and other notes were not relevant. This was against my understanding of what discovery of documents meant in a litigation proceeding. Each party has to disclose everything even the kitchen sink. If the documents were not relevant who decides what is relevant. It seems that David Bell decides what is relevant or is not relevant. Does that mean David Bell will only produce documents that are good for his client and other documents that could provide evidence to the detriment of Bell's client do not have to be disclosed. This is bizarre. In the Dominion v. Fox case, Tucker Carlson produced all his emails i.e. the kitchen sink. I would assume that it would have been up to Dominion to decide if documents are relevant or not. Maybe in the US document discovery is different than in Canada. I am very confused.

Testing to see why my posts went missing XXX

Testing to see why my posts went missing

FULL SPEECH: Tucker Carlson’s Last Address Before Leaving Fox News at #H...

Tucker Carlson Mocks Herd Mentality In Address Delivered Three Days Befo...

He speaks of telling the truth. See @15:01. The hardest thing I had to face in my litigation was to get someone to tell the truth...

"Something Shocking Is Happening To Me As I Speak...!" | Jordan Peterson...

I do not know why this video is not being shared although it is still on YouTube. The reason I want to post it as I feel that everyone especially professionals/academics should listen to it. He speaks that speaking out is worth it. Speaking out has cost him a lot but he has had the support of his wife, children, associates and others and he also has access to a battery of lawyers which he said was very expensive and I had none of these supports. How could I try to make VCHA be made accountable as they are petty tyrants and authorative. Recently I attempted to contact a person who tried to help me many years ago. I was told that he had retired so I did not expect him to say to me that , "I cannot engage." Even after all these years he is afraid.

I wonder if VCHA defamed me ... everyone involved seemed to conspire to discredit me

​ Rupert Murdoch's son Lachlan ends Australian defamation suit

 

READ: The story here about Rupert Murdoch's son and his defamation case.

Cancellation/Suspension of an Enduring Power of Attorney cont'd

 I spent time again reviewing the legislation on how the PGT/VCHA could have cancelled/suspended my Enduring Power of |Attorney.  I couldn't find anything in the legislative Acts.  The only one who could have rescinded my EPA would have been my husband. In the "world" of the PGT, maybe there is a regulation that says it can cancel an EPA but there would have to be some "paperwork."  This serious legal issue could be why the Defendant Litigants pushed for this litigation to be dismissed. They wanted it forgotten and hidden in the pleadings.  I remember complaining to the Ombudsperson Mr.Chalke in person about the PGT and he said I could appeal it.  What arrogance. I remember looking at him in dismay.  The PGT can make a mistake maybe by design and I could appeal it. Mistakes by the PGT  should not have happened in the first place. But then maybe the PGT deliberately did this, knowing that I would never appeal it or even know I could appeal it as I had no money and it would be impossible to hire a lawyer. At no time before the Certificate of Incapability was issued did the PGT say that they were going to rescind the EPA by way of a secret administrative court.  

The Neall Epstein case and me

 The more I think about what VCHA tried to do to me i.e. attempting to charge me with criminal harassment, the more scared I feel.  How could it defame me. And, it was done with the advice of their lawyers or one of their risk management people. It had to be both. I once asked risk management for a list of its employees and what university degrees each had and I never received a reply.  I was driven to be so crazy in my head I was looking for "why."  I wanted to know if these employees had degrees in "behavioural psychology."  A degree in how to control people "brainwashing." How to "gaslight." I still would like to know.  Such information should be public knowledge.  And I feel safe that the police refused to proceed with the bogus charge.Those with power forget that it only takes one person to derail them. In my case two burly police officers.

Cure For The Monday Blues The King v. Neall Epstein

The King v. Neall Epstein (go to 12.20.00 minute on the YouTube video).

I am more than angry.  Towards the end of the video, it was pointed out that Neall Epstein if found guilty of nonsense he could have lost his job as a teacher and he would lose $20,000 paying a lawyer for defending his case at trial without any recourse to get the money reimbursed.  

This is what Dr. Dunne attempted to do to me. I remember when the burly police officers were at my residence.  A neighbour told me later that there were two police cars there, and she wanted to know what the two burly police officers wanted.  The police briefly spoke to me and left. This attempt to criminally charge me should be enough for Dr. Dunne to have his medical licence taken away from him considering he has a higher standard of conduct in the eyes of the courts to behave. I do not blame Dr. Dunne, I blame VCHA and their lawyer, David Bell.  I remember saying to the burly police officers why were they trying to criminally charge me as this should be civil.  I might have been wrong about that as I do not know if you can sue someone civilly for harassment.  But then I am not a lawyer.  

Depending on the wordsmithing of what happened to Randy and me our story is far more bizarrely hilarious than of Epstein's.  It might have cost him $20,000 for legal costs, but it cost me substantially more. I wanted the case to be dropped as I was ill but the lawyers refused. I sent Morris an email and he never answered it.  Morris was the lawyer who took the position of being the spokesperson for all the ligating lawyers and he was being paid by the union (the insurer for the physicians).  I went over their heads and contacted Victoria. I had to be punished. 

When Nurse Ratchet decided to come after me, I was nearly 70 years old and weighed 110 pounds.  A far cry from the 180 pounds I weighed before Randy was imprisoned by VCHA. I remember the first social worker I talked to at VCHA who said that I should just forget about Randy as they would look after him.  I do not know who "they" were but I wasn't going to talk to that social worker ever again. Later my lawyer said Randy was imprisoned.  During the six months Randy was at VGH, I visited him every single day, taking a bus from the far easterly side of Burnaby.  I had no money, and I remember standing on the street near VGH asking for money so that I could pay for the fee ($20.00) rent now and then so that Randy could have access to paid TV.  I remember the social worker nurse said that Randy did not qualify for a free TV.  Randy was disabled, bedridden, and he could not talk. I was always exhausted and I would fall asleep on his bed, at the end of his bed curled up in a fetal position. The nurses would pass by and cover me.

 The only reason Randy lived so long was that VGH was a teaching hospital, and he was used as a specimen as he had complex injuries for the training of new physicians.  I knew that at that time, and I was grateful to the young doctors for keeping him alive.  Dr. Dunne should have been charged for attempting to charge me falsely criminally.  He got off lightly.  Maybe he should be charged now.  VCH should be charged as an accessory as well. I remember what one of the burly police officers said to me at that time but I do not know if it was confidential or not. The burly two police officers used "discretion" which was absent in the Epstein case.

PS  I was thinking about why VCHA wanted me to be charged with criminal harassment.  It would make me a criminal and the PGT would take over Randy's care.  And during the interim, from being charged to becoming convicted, I would become more than a basket case than I was already. How evil.

The King v. Neall Epstein (2023 Quebec)

 How interesting. From reading about the case of the King v. Neall Epstein (Rebel News and MSN Canada Press (March 10, 2023)) I learned what criminal harassment is. It involves stalking.  

During my interaction with Vancouver Coastal Health, it went so far as to have Dr. Dunne attempt to lay a criminal charge against me for criminal harassment. I did not follow Dr. Dunne around.  Truth is if I saw him on the street today I won't be able to recognize him. Burly police officers showed up at my door. So where did Dr. Dunne get the education to do that. I suspect it was from his employer, VCH, and its lawyer, David Bell. Maybe Joe Morris of Harper Gray had something to do with it as he was the lawyer for the union that defends physicians. I guess this is what is called co-opted "litigation strategy." Or, win by any means possible. Just gaslight the woman from her rights. This should be easy as she has PTSD.

But then thinking back maybe criminal harassment includes emails. Dr. Dunne said I sent him what could be interpreted as hundreds of emails. He referred to these emails in an affidavit. When I asked for the emails the lawyers for him (VCH) said I was not entitled to them. The litigation involved an injunction wherein I wanted to see my husband and such evidence did not have to be given to me. In other words, you can lie in affidavits and get away with it. I sent a lot of emails but they were mostly directed to VCHA not Dr. Dunne.

The interesting thing about the King v. Neall Epstein case (Justice Galiatsatos) said that the complainant should have been charged with various criminal charges, not Neall Epstein.

When my litigation started I really really really believed that the lawyers would tell VCH that they were being ridiculous and for them to just let me see my husband. My husband was dying so why couldn't I see him. But of course, lawyers just do what their clients tell them. All of us know that this is not true.  

Romilda ANG

 I want to know why Randy was put in a private room at George Pearson Centre?

Romilda was the manager at GPC, and she told me to remove most of Randy's possessions.

Previously, Randy had a space in an open ward with only a tiny wardrobe cupboard. The private room had a lot of space.

She was trying to make her life easier as she knew Randy was going to die.  A body is easier to dispose of if a dead person does not have any possessions.

  

Days lost ... and David Bell

 These past few days have been a “lost.” On Monday I could not sleep as I was afraid I would not wake up as I had to be at court at 8:45 am Tuesday.  The case was adjourned/cancelled.  It took me until now to feel like I recovered from the lack of sleep.  I am receiving at least 200 emails a day, mostly informational types, things I am interested in but have no time to read them.  Call it “overload.”  I have been trying to get FOI information from VGH, but nothing is forthcoming. VCHA successfully dismissed my litigation, and now they are keeping back information, so I cannot understand what happened. These emails would surely tell me. No one else is interested; I just want to know.  What piqued my interest in this now history is that David Bell, the lawyer for VCHA, while in the litigation, did not complete a demand for discovery of documents, that is, give to me all the emails, etc., that VCHA has and which would still be in his possession. I mentioned this to the justice at the dismissal, and she did not deem it important enough to pursue.  She said that it was in all parties' interests for her to decide to dismiss the action.  Whose interest … Later, I asked the court registry if I could get a message to the justice for an explanation, the registry said "no."

xxx  xxx

My post of February 9 2023

 I should not have said we were destroyed by the actions of VCHA and their hired help.  I am still alive but because of their unkind actions, I am still distracted. I cannot find pleasure in anything. Professionals are still disappointing me. You would think as time passed things would have been forgotten but instead they are becoming more intensified.  I find myself in periods with tears each day.  I am forced to stay home. The regret will not go away.

I can't stop thinking

 I can't stop thinking back to when Randy had his accident.  Although it has been many years, it was as it was yesterday.  I can see and feel what I was going through.  The trauma of it all.  The accident was an accident but what I had to go through with VCH was no accident.  From the moment I found out that VCH secretly moved Randy from VGH to GPC, I was targeted. I can still hear the head nurse, Tanu, saying that she had the power to make sure that I never see my husband again, not even on his deathbed. I did not know why she would say that.  And her "power" did happen.  I was also told that I was not allowed to speak to anyone unless I was spoken to first.  I taught she was crazy. I did not argue with her, I just ignored her. She also told me that I could not touch my husband; not even hold his hand or touch his bed. What was Randy thinking!  He was disabled and could not talk.  What a terrible person she was.  At that time I did not think too much about her.  Later I concluded she was a Nurse Ratchet. She was so sure of herself that she did not even notice that I had a friend "witness" with me at that time who heard all this and told me later that she could not believe Tanu would say what she said.  I did not take much note as it was just talk.  I had no belief at that time that this woman would eventually destroy my life and that of my husband's.  

the Warriner case

 Upon rereading the newspaper accounts on the Warriner case I might be led to believe that Stephanie was trying to leave the hospital and security tried to stop her.  It had nothing to do with her wearing a mask or not.  She might have been trying to escape and security attacked her. This is what happened to me when I tried to leave a hospital of VGH.  Personnel had no knowledge that they cannot imprison a patient.  I tried to remove my husband as he was in a wheelchair and he did not want to stay at GPC.  The police were called and no charges were laid against VCH or Paladin security. Or me.  I expected apologies but none came.  Instead, they created a scenario which took three months to discredit me and caused severe psychological harm to my husband. 

The Stephanie Warriner case ...

 I just finished reading about the Stephanie Warriner case (Toronto area Hospital) wherein she was put in a wheelchair while limp and my mind went back to April 4 2016 when the interim pro bono lawyer I had went to George Pearson Centre to check on my husband and he advised me that my husband was in his wheelchair sleeping and everything was good.

If he was so good why was it that my husband was transferred within one hour to VGH.  He subsequently died. 

If the lawyer did not attend, my husband would surely have died as he was allegedly sleeping in his wheelchair, perhaps staged for the benefit of my lawyer, so no one would have noticed if he was in silent respiratory distress. Although very fragile, he wasn't hooked up to any monitors.  He was supposed to have been on the protocol CPR but I suspect, like before, he was on an illegal slow code (December 26, 2013).  The manager became afraid and did not want his death on her watch and called 911.  Like Jordan Peterson said: the truth always rises.

The sister of Stephanie, in the CTV report January 18 2023 said her family endured trauma which is "indescribable" and is an "ongoing grief" that "never ends."  My grief caused by VGH is the same.  Maybe worse ...  as it was not so cut-and-dry.

College of Psychologists vs Jordan B Peterson | Mikhaila Peterson | EP 322 Watch this and Substitute VCHA for OCP and you would get a sense of what VCHA did to me. I was demoralized. .

December 26th continuing

 I keep thinking about what happened on that Boxing day.  The staff at GPC did nothing for an hour.  They did not check his vitals or give him oxygen, they just waited for one hour to see if he would die.  He didn't so they then phoned 911.  Randy was hospitalized previously most of the year at VGH and he did not want to be returned to GPC. He was afraid.  VGH returned him to GPC to die.  He was placed rather than in the open ward in a private room, which is where they place those that are going to die or they want them to die, and they close the door ...  When I visited him I was not allowed to talk to anyone.  And no one would tell me anything although I was his wife.  Besides being his wife I had what proved to be useless documents them being a health representation agreement and an enduring power of attorney.  Both of which VCH gave no credence to.  They just ghosted me.  The doctor on call that night was Dr, Richard Hay who put Randy on a "slow code."