No privacy when you are a non-person (incapable)

 When the state decides that a person is incapable, thus making the person a non-person, I want to know who that person is. That person has to be protected by the community at large.

 A non-person is a person that has no rights. Alluding that a non-person has rights is a fiction. It is a civil death. 

And according to common law, a non-person has no right to privacy, so there is no reason not to publish their names.  

-----

Guardianship: Life under the hidden control of the Public Trustee system in Australia.

Are the Defendants Litigators (Respondents) bullying me.

A friend sent me a link this afternoon from HuffPost, Canada is Corrupt when it comes to Choosing Judges. It is a popularity contest.

One of the links connected me to a report by Christie Blatchford: BC Man Pleads for Family Court Reform in Suicide Note.

The victim only wanted to see his kids and I only wanted to see my husband. The motivation is the same.

Another link said Canadian Lawyers Drive Dads to Bankruptcy and Suicide by Bullying.  

Is this the intent of the lawyers who see themselves as Joseph Croias bullying witnesses without conscience and this disagreeable lawyer became president of the Ontario Law Society. My case is not of a white collar crime over greed in the billions of dollars it is over the untimely death of my husband and the collateral outfall.

So far the defendants have discredited me and demoralized me. I am a basket case. Look what I am doing today:  It is December 25 2020. 

I won't commit suicide as I have a very good therapist.  A therapist that costs me $225 an hour.  I have no additional medical insurance provided by an employe rso he alone is costing me money I cannot afford.  To get access to a MSP psychiatrist, it takes six months to a year to exercise a referral, and then there is no guarantee that he will take you as a patient. Most psychiatrists will not write a medical legal report because they are under no obligation to do so.  It is a lot of work and they do not want to be a witness in court. My psychologist could not do a medical legal report as he was biased. 

Lawyers do not seek the truth; they only seek to demoralize, so you give up.  And the Groias like Joel Morris are clever at it.  

One of the links said that such lawyers should be shamed.  So be it:

• David Bell, Partner at Guild Yule, lawyer for VCHA
• Joel Morris, Partner at Harper Grey, lawyer for Dr. James Dunne
  
• Murray Wolf, lawyer for the Public Guardian and Trustee 
• Cameron Wong, Webster Hudson, lawyer for David Doig, lawyer, 

None of the defendant pay for lawyers.legal costs.  They are all insured by the public purse one way or other  And the public cannot find out how much money the lawyers are creaming as it is under solicitor-client privilege. The tax payer should have the right to know.   And the the lawyers do not loose any sleep over anything as they are but agents of the government and are assured payment of their fees monthly. They are much like civil servants and nothing can happen to them.

 In August of this year, I tried to negotiate with the Groias to settle the matter.  They refused. No comment. And they would not give me a name of an expert legal medical report which they have on their rolex.  They knew I was suffereing from PTSD and since a medical expert legal person has to be independent they were not going to allow such evidence to be entered in the court record..  All of them  were guilty of perverting justice as they had to provide all evidence to the court whether it be in their clients' favour or in mine  When the action started in the hearing the master (a judge) suggested that the defendants offer an apology.  No apology came.  Their path was to drive me insane as no one would believe me and no lawyer would take on my case.

 

 

 

 

Duping Delight

I came across what "duping delight" means. It is what happened to me at the hands of the VCHA.  From social workers, administrators, nurses and a physician when they asserted that I had no legal rights regarding my husband.

Duping delight is what happens when a person in a position of power looks down on you and displays a half-smile (or a quarter-smile).  When this would happen to me I was taken aback into silence as I believed this was not true. How could I not have any rights when it concerned my husband.  And after all these years I found out that they were correct.

VCHA could have you banned and your power of attorney and representation agreement revoked based on collateral (snowflake) gossip without even telling you aforehand.  The PGT is supposed to be independent but it does what VCHA tells it.

I was talking to a resident from George Pearson Centre recently and was told that no one complains as they will be punished.  The only problem with that reasoning is that if patients are compliant then it is easier to kill them.

And now I have been told (November 8, 2019) that I have to pay advanced costs in the amount of $16,000 by December 31 2019 to VCHA/PGT or my application/case against the health authority and the PGT cannot go forward. So what is the point. You do the right thing and you are blocked by lack of money.   I will never get a court decision. It is called security for costs. 

---------


I also would like you to listen to minutes 2 to 10 on YouTube which will tell you that DNRs could hasten your death. What Does that DNR Really Mean? Dr. F. Mararchi.  Posted June 29 2019.

---------


DNRs are dangerous for patients with pneumonia, trauma, strokes, vascular problems and other treatable conditions, according to studies in the Archives of Internal Medicine and Critical Care Medicine. An analysis of California hospitals published found that patients had higher death rates in hospitals that encourage DNRs.  My take is that if a patient cannot be encouraged then they coerce patients to agree to a DNR.  VCHA never tells a patient why a DNR is dangerous.

PGTism in BC

After researching BC Public Guardian and Trustee, I  created a new word to describe it and it is "PGTism."

Later I received a phone call from the BCCLA thanking me for my donation.  I asked how much did I donate.  He said $20.00.  I said I made a mistake as I was only going to give it $10.00.  The BCCLA is frustrating as it seldom answers its phone or replies to emails. 

He also wanted some feedback, and so I said, what is the BCCLA going to do about PGTism?

Of course, the young man, who sounded very well education, did not know what PGTism was, neither did he know what a Public Guardian and Trustee was; however, I did leave him to ponder: how could a regulation, not a law, make an adult a "non-person."  Being named a non-person should be under the purview of the Supreme Court.


Making an adult a non-person is not the same thing as regulating how the Liquor Control Board should do its job.  How insulting of British Columbia to subject any one of us to being regulated. Stripping us of our autonomy by use of a regulation.

Statutory Guardianship Act Regulation (2014).