As things are progressing, I feel so overwhelmed and afraid. I was told by VCHA it is my fault that I caused all that I am suffering. No where does it say that the actors contributed any mal behavior. They are all protected by insurance companies and their unions, it is only I who have flashbacks and cannot sleep. These are healthcare professionals not school yard bullies. They cannot even be shamed or shunned as their culture embraces such behaviors. No one will confront them and say they did wrong, they will just offer condolences by their coworkers that they were unfortunately caught, if a sliver of a complaint was made.
Gone ballistic scenarios. Activist by default. audreyjlaferriere@gmail.com phone: 604-321-2276,do not leave voice mail http://voiceofgoneballistic.blogspot.com 207-5524 Cambie Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 3A2 Everything posted I believe to be true. If not, please let me know.
Search This Blog
Friday, November 24, 2017
Monday, November 13, 2017
Hastening of Death
There has to more than me just not being allowed on VCHA properties. I keep thinking back. Randy was put on the Liverpool Pathway. A Pathway used when physicians decide a patient should die. They are trying to discredit/demoralize me so whatever I say would have no relevance. And I am ashamed to say that they are meeting their goal. Randy fought, he did not want to die. And I was able to save him for a few more months. So what did VCHA do before he finally died, they banned me 24/7 for being disruptive (irrationality at its extreme). And I was told that it was my fault that my husband died isolated and alone. And if that was not bad enough, they went the extra mile and instructed the PGT to rob me of my spousal right with a Certificate of Incapability. VCHA declared Randy incompetent. A Certificate of Incapability says that a wife has no say, NONE. NONE. NONE. They with malice intent did this.
---------
I came across this on the internet. It was written by Ron Panzer who has been writing about stealth euthanasia (hastening death) for years.
"Imposed death" conveys the idea that is was not a natural death arising from an illness, that someone acted in a way to cause it, and often would be unwanted or involuntary.
More important than any of these legal definitions or musings is the complete inaccessibility of the judicial system by those who are wronged. Civil attorneys will not take these cases as there is little monetary worth in the "eyes of the court" for a financial award to make the aggrieved "whole" in the civil court sense. And, criminal investigations by the police are not undertaken in earnest if they are done at all. In almost all cases, the police will not get involved. Even if you have conclusive proof that someone was murdered within a hospice or other palliative care setting (in hospital or nursing home/palliative care bed), the District attorneys refuse to prosecute.
So, the license to kill exists, and many family members recognize this and "use" the healthcare system to eliminate the elderly or disabled, or whoever, in order to get their hands on the estate/house/etc. sooner, to rid themselves of the "burden" of a family member they no longer wish to care for, or simply because they are utilitarians who do not value the life of the patient.
Whatever form the ending of life takes (assisted-suicide, euthanasia, or undeclared stealth euthanasia), the healthcare system has endorsed these endings of life/imposed deaths. The staff, administrators, and bureaucrats in government no longer base their decision-making on a "Do No Harm" or sanctity of life ethic and this is the result.
Ron
---------
I came across this on the internet. It was written by Ron Panzer who has been writing about stealth euthanasia (hastening death) for years.
"Imposed death" conveys the idea that is was not a natural death arising from an illness, that someone acted in a way to cause it, and often would be unwanted or involuntary.
More important than any of these legal definitions or musings is the complete inaccessibility of the judicial system by those who are wronged. Civil attorneys will not take these cases as there is little monetary worth in the "eyes of the court" for a financial award to make the aggrieved "whole" in the civil court sense. And, criminal investigations by the police are not undertaken in earnest if they are done at all. In almost all cases, the police will not get involved. Even if you have conclusive proof that someone was murdered within a hospice or other palliative care setting (in hospital or nursing home/palliative care bed), the District attorneys refuse to prosecute.
So, the license to kill exists, and many family members recognize this and "use" the healthcare system to eliminate the elderly or disabled, or whoever, in order to get their hands on the estate/house/etc. sooner, to rid themselves of the "burden" of a family member they no longer wish to care for, or simply because they are utilitarians who do not value the life of the patient.
Whatever form the ending of life takes (assisted-suicide, euthanasia, or undeclared stealth euthanasia), the healthcare system has endorsed these endings of life/imposed deaths. The staff, administrators, and bureaucrats in government no longer base their decision-making on a "Do No Harm" or sanctity of life ethic and this is the result.
Ron
Thursday, November 9, 2017
I still do not understand.....
I keep waking up in the middle of the night wondering why has this progressed so far. All I wanted was to be with my husband. And with the help of Nurse Ratshed and other VCHA actors I was prevented from doing so. I was seventy years old why did they do this.
When I started a petition in the courts in mid March 2014 within two weeks Randy was declared incompetent and he became a non-person. To become a non-person you only have to be is incompetent and the family is denied rights to decisions. The new decision maker controls even visitation. The new decision maker does not even have to tell you where your family member is. Families might be consulted, but so what. In Randy's case, the same physician who put an unauthorized DNR on my husband assessed him as being incapable. Randy had no rights nor I.
I did not have to do anything wrong. They just make you believe that you did and they document nonsense. This avenue is only a PR administrative function. You become upset and you do not venture further than blaming yourself. They are very good at it. The world of Nurse Ratsheds.
Maybe it might be easier to understand as per the Canadian Bill C-14 Euthanasia Bill. There is no requirement to allow family to know of the intended lethal injection. However, VCHA encourages family involvement so the family becomes complicit in the decision. It is PR, nothing else.
I came across this post from 2013.
When I started a petition in the courts in mid March 2014 within two weeks Randy was declared incompetent and he became a non-person. To become a non-person you only have to be is incompetent and the family is denied rights to decisions. The new decision maker controls even visitation. The new decision maker does not even have to tell you where your family member is. Families might be consulted, but so what. In Randy's case, the same physician who put an unauthorized DNR on my husband assessed him as being incapable. Randy had no rights nor I.
I did not have to do anything wrong. They just make you believe that you did and they document nonsense. This avenue is only a PR administrative function. You become upset and you do not venture further than blaming yourself. They are very good at it. The world of Nurse Ratsheds.
Maybe it might be easier to understand as per the Canadian Bill C-14 Euthanasia Bill. There is no requirement to allow family to know of the intended lethal injection. However, VCHA encourages family involvement so the family becomes complicit in the decision. It is PR, nothing else.
I came across this post from 2013.
Friday, November 1, 2013
The bastards at George Pearson Centre
Randy was admitted to Vancouver General Hospital late October 31 2013.
Tanu knew how sick Randy was on Thursday and she true to her word won't let me on
the ward so I could see him. What a demented person she is. Randy is
very fragile and he could die at any time.
Finally, at the end of tonight at VGH, Randy became responsive to me.
I was so afraid that he might die or he was on his way to be a vegetable because of brain damage. A vegetable created by the neglect and psychological mistreatment of him at George Pearson Centre.
I just do not understand Vancouver Coastal Health. They think they can do what they like without regard for human decency. I do not know what their agenda is but will someone please tell me.
Finally, Richard Singleton advised me that Randy is not being detained against his will. After two weeks Randy is now free and not only is he free I was told that he is also competent. So why did they attack me on October 21 2013 and prevent Randy from exiting George Pearson Centre. What is the point of his freedom when he is with infection again and in acute care.. And I still want to knew where do these infections keep coming from.
Nothing is happening to anyone at George Pearson Centre except I am still unjustly banned. VCH is using the argument that it is private property and they do not need a reason to ban anyone from the property. The only flaw in that argument is that the purpose of a hospital is for the patients and their families. Patients and families triumph trespass.
I did only what Randy wanted and acted in self defence. Those $100,000 nurses that were traumatized and created the drama had a few days off with pay at the taxpayers expense. No apology just revenge by Tanu that no way I am going to be at Randy's bedside if he is sick at George Pearson Centre. Like she threatened me three years ago that she could arrange that I never see Randy again..
What has our medical system become or has it always been that way.
This should have been handled via due process in 2010 which is the policy of Vancouver Coastal Health when I asked for and even went to a board meeting and asked for help and was assured of an independent investigation of the conduct resulting in my banning which never happened.. Why should they do due process because if they did it would have to find in my favour.
Policies are made to satisfy the government but are rarely followed.
.
Finally, at the end of tonight at VGH, Randy became responsive to me.
I was so afraid that he might die or he was on his way to be a vegetable because of brain damage. A vegetable created by the neglect and psychological mistreatment of him at George Pearson Centre.
I just do not understand Vancouver Coastal Health. They think they can do what they like without regard for human decency. I do not know what their agenda is but will someone please tell me.
Finally, Richard Singleton advised me that Randy is not being detained against his will. After two weeks Randy is now free and not only is he free I was told that he is also competent. So why did they attack me on October 21 2013 and prevent Randy from exiting George Pearson Centre. What is the point of his freedom when he is with infection again and in acute care.. And I still want to knew where do these infections keep coming from.
Nothing is happening to anyone at George Pearson Centre except I am still unjustly banned. VCH is using the argument that it is private property and they do not need a reason to ban anyone from the property. The only flaw in that argument is that the purpose of a hospital is for the patients and their families. Patients and families triumph trespass.
I did only what Randy wanted and acted in self defence. Those $100,000 nurses that were traumatized and created the drama had a few days off with pay at the taxpayers expense. No apology just revenge by Tanu that no way I am going to be at Randy's bedside if he is sick at George Pearson Centre. Like she threatened me three years ago that she could arrange that I never see Randy again..
What has our medical system become or has it always been that way.
This should have been handled via due process in 2010 which is the policy of Vancouver Coastal Health when I asked for and even went to a board meeting and asked for help and was assured of an independent investigation of the conduct resulting in my banning which never happened.. Why should they do due process because if they did it would have to find in my favour.
Policies are made to satisfy the government but are rarely followed.
.
Tuesday, November 7, 2017
The obligation of a lawyer
I got his from a recent CBC news talk in which a lawyer said:
An overarching obligation that we have is to be an officer of the court, and our obligation to the court is even higher than to our clients. So, if we use these types of tactics (use of blackmail) to get what our clients want, we are undermining public confidence in our work.
An overarching obligation that we have is to be an officer of the court, and our obligation to the court is even higher than to our clients. So, if we use these types of tactics (use of blackmail) to get what our clients want, we are undermining public confidence in our work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)