Litigation dismissed...

 The litigation was dismissed.  I do not really know why as there are multiple reasons in my head.  I can't get a clear answer from anyone involved.  The best I can tell, it was a technicality (or technicalities).  When you are in a court hearing, things are happening so fast and you do not have time to comprehend what is happening. You can't reference YourTube. And then it is over and you do not fully understand why. To understand why I would have to engage a lawyer if I can find one who would be willing to decipher what happened, which will cost money. Since there was no trial, the allegations set out in the amended notice of civil claim are unanswered so they are still true. Dismissing an action only means that it cannot be litigated again.  It does not mean that the parties are cleared of any wrongdoing. I do not know why the defendants' lawyers insisted that the action be dismissed. You would think that the defendants would want the truth to be known. And I do not know why the hearing justice concurred with them. When I asked scheduling (the court) for an explanation, I was told that it was not possible to communicate with the justice. Maybe it is best that I do not know.