My brother (6)

 I could not understand why the lawyers used the fact that according to them I was a prolific litigator.  I thought at first both of them were going to the bottom of the barrel to discredit me.  No it was far more strategic than that.  It was on purpose in their quest to win.  Win what, the right for my sister to be the administrator, a woman who was not qualified.  A woman who told me that she was forced to become the administrator. When I read it, I thought how stupid to mention my prolific history of being a unlawful litigator.  However, it was strategic, as court documents mentioned, since my brother signed an affidavit based on his belief that I had an improper motive for bringing the action.  The improper motive being that I hated my brother and I would do anything to make sure he never saw his inheritance. How that had anything to do with Jenny being the administrator is beyond me. My brother is 78 years old.  I am 80.  Statistically I am going to be dead before him, so I won't get the benefit of the inheritance as well. If it wasn't important so I thought why would the hearing judge mention that I was a prolific litigator in his judgment.  There is a court case Pintea that has established that a self representative has to be given consideration.  Both Leah and Candace and their cohort of lawyers must be proud because the hearing judge did not give me much consideration. He just said that whatever happens is my fault as I choose to be a fool and self-litigate as I started the litigation.  He missed the point, it is legal to self-representat yourself in Canada. My application was dismissed because of a procedural error: I did not fill out the application property and an improper motive.. At the very least I expected the judge to have a sidebar chat with Leah and Candace and tell them that Jenny should not be the administrator. In my submission at the hearing I did tell the judge that I wanted an independent person that did not have conflicts to be appointed. And because I had improper motive I was punished by having the court decide that I should pay special costs which is a humiliation considering what my pure motive was.  My pure motive was to remove Jenny from being administrator because she was not qualified.  Both Candace and Leah should be applauded for their giganteous legal research to win at any cost. Both of the missed the point as both of them are officers of the court and playing such games insults the rule of law and leads to disrespect of the law.  By mentioning my prolific litigation records therefore the hearing judge should not give me any consideration.  I knew what I was doing, he said.  And that is exactly what happened. I can only compare my experience to Bigley the hanging judge in 1800s British Columbia. I can't blame my brother as he was only wanting the probate over with.  And he did not understand what he was doing.  They set me up and I am not happy. My sister also said improper motive was to delay the estate and prevent my brother from getting his inheritance.  Although she is the administrator, she does not know what she is doing, she just does what her lawyer tells her to do. Sign here and she does. What do you expect from a woman with a grade 3 education and being a former rodeo beauty queen.  She is into rodeos and her home full of animals, and nothing else.  Not only does she have a limited education she also has conflicts of interests which has not concerned anyone.  Where there is smoke, there is fire.  Besides the conflicts of interests what are they and how long have they existed. There is a want of honesty on the part of my sister which she has not fostered.