Why the public guardian and trustee should publish names of those that are incapable

 How would anyone know if a person is incapable to contract (have agency) unless there is a register published by the Public Guardian and Trustee available to the public.  

Adult Guardianship Act BC

Transfer of property by incapable adult

60.2   (1)If an adult transfers an interest in the adult's property while the adult is incapable, the transfer is voidable against the adult unless

(a)the interest was transferred for full and valuable consideration, and that consideration was actually paid or secured to the adult, or

(b)at the time of the transfer, a reasonable person would not have known that the adult was incapable.

(2)In a proceeding in respect of a transfer described in subsection (1), the onus of proving a matter described in subsection (1) (b) is on the person to whom the interest was transferred.

Guardianship: Life under the hidden control of the Public Trustee system in Australia.

Privacy again

This past week I spoke with two persons who like me had troubles with the health authorities a decade ago. Each of us experienced trauma because Vancouver Health Authority would not share information with us.  If the health authority thinks you are discrediting them, there is no help. Not from the media, not from physicians, not from advocacy organizations, nothing.  A reporter told they would not run my story as I would be harmed. If you have no money for lawyers, then they will show you the door.  And if you have money, they take your money until you have none and then show you the door.  Resources are limited and the law deters to the health authorities. Think a trusted person would never molest a child.  At the end you only have regret and silent anger. The pattern of their behavior is so obvious, like they are following a flow chart.  When my litigation was dismissed because my lawyer did not follow the rules, and I could not represent myself; the lawyers for VCH et al, all rejoiced in the courtroom leaving me bewildered. And the judge did not condemn them for their mal behavior.But then in her hurried departure, maybe she did not notice. Neither did she entertain my plea for an adjournment. Granting an adjournment would not have been necessary if the litigators for the health authority et al would have consented.  Why would VCHA want the litigation dismissed. You would think they would welcome transparency and an open forum. 

  

Relocation by the State

Stats re those that have been involutarily taken (Mental Health Act).

 "Further, of those 1,468 patient files, only 471 contained a Notification to Near Relative (Form 16). This is a compliance rate of about 32 percent. In other words, based on the information provided to us, the parents, siblings, children or other near relatives of 997 involuntary patients admitted in British Columbia in June 2017 did not receive the required formal notice that their family member had been involuntarily admitted or, importantly, the information about that person’s right to challenge their detention."   

Why

Why should you do the right thing when you do not have to.

The answer is within

Listen to "Your Consent is Not Required with Rob Wipond Part 2"