Most importantly, the PGT wishes to point out that Ms. Laferriere has already attempted to have the grant of administration to Ms. Mead revoked. She is now, through her standing application, attempting to again take on the role and powers of the administrator. … Ms. Laferriere should not be permitted to obtain through the back door, what she could not obtain through the front door.
from submission to the court when I asked for standing so that I could participate in the passing of accounts of the PGT.
The judge decided I should not participate because the administrator and the public guardian and trustee did not want me to know what is going on. They did not want anyone to scrutinize the spending of millions of dollars. As I am not allowed proof of what the expenses were (invoices and discovery) I cannot determine whether or not the administrator used the estate funds as her personal ATM. There is no law that prevents me from participating in a passing of accounts. If there is, please let me know. 778 689 2276.
Most importantly, the PGT wishes to point out that Ms. Laferriere has already attempted to have the grant of administration to Ms. Mead revoked. She is now, through her standing application, attempting to again take on the role and powers of the administrator. … Ms. Laferriere should not be permitted to obtain through the back door, what she could not obtain through the front door.
Considering that Ms Mead was heavily conflicted, the PGT should have made sure that the court knew of such conflicts as the conflicts were facilitated by the PGT. The administrator cannot approve its own spending. The PGT did not vet expenses, it just signed cheques, providing to the administrator/care giver an open expense account to do what she wants at her discretion under the cloud that the expenses were for the direct benefit of caring for my brother.
