Nothing to report but grief.
.
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Friday, April 18, 2014
13 April 2014 @ 7:55 pm Sunday Randy Michael Walker Died (10/12/56)
Randy died. I am not sure of what, but he is dead. It happened so fast. He is dead. My Randy is dead. And I will never see him again. We had no family, no close friends, we only had each other. And now he is gone. And talking about him and what caused his death will not bring him back.
I have been asked how can those that know me help. Even if you do not know me or Randy you can help by sending us an old-fashioned sympathy card stamped and delivered by Canada Post.
Audrey Jane Laferriere
Randy Michael Walker
5976 Cambie Street
Vancouver, B.C.
V5Z 3A9
For my memory box.
604.321.2276
.
Friday, April 11, 2014
Randy in ICU
Randy at ICU VGH
I just got a phone call that Randy has taken a turn for the worse and he is at ICU. I do not know what to say to all those who was part in the banning.
What harm did I do. Everything I did was for Randy. Overstaying visiting hours is hardly a reason for a total ban. Defending myself and Randy against a hoard of staff who battered me and it has been turned around to say it is my fault. I feel whenever I have to deal with the health authority that I live in a country where I have no rights. You are judged by hearsay by dysfunctional individual who delight in causing harm. Bullies. The hospital system is full of them.
When I went to the ICU even though I had a court order to see Randy I had to wait two hours. The ICU had to wait for a copy of the order to be delivered to them. And I was told not to talk to anyone and I could not use any lounges if I was asked to leave Randy's room. I had to wait off VCH's property. I am sure he has septic shock; he had laboured breathing, and a high temperature. He could not recognize me.
I just got a phone call that Randy has taken a turn for the worse and he is at ICU. I do not know what to say to all those who was part in the banning.
What harm did I do. Everything I did was for Randy. Overstaying visiting hours is hardly a reason for a total ban. Defending myself and Randy against a hoard of staff who battered me and it has been turned around to say it is my fault. I feel whenever I have to deal with the health authority that I live in a country where I have no rights. You are judged by hearsay by dysfunctional individual who delight in causing harm. Bullies. The hospital system is full of them.
When I went to the ICU even though I had a court order to see Randy I had to wait two hours. The ICU had to wait for a copy of the order to be delivered to them. And I was told not to talk to anyone and I could not use any lounges if I was asked to leave Randy's room. I had to wait off VCH's property. I am sure he has septic shock; he had laboured breathing, and a high temperature. He could not recognize me.
Friday, April 10, 2014
I saw Randy today for my court allotted thirty minutes. He was extremely hot and not very responsive except towards the end when I mentioned I would rent a television for him for the weekend. If I can't see him at least he can watch tv.
I still do not know what terrible harm I did to bandish me from being with Randy during his last months of life. The medical system has not feelings for the living. What terrible thing did I do. Not follow one of their stupid rules: you have to leasve at 4:00 pm and if your leave at 4:30 you will be banned for the rest of your life. That is absurb. And that is what they are doing. All I want is to see her husband; nothing more nothing less. VGH creates guidelines that mean nothing and harm no one. They are all front line workers used to some chaos so why it is directed to me. They can't prove anything, it is all hearsay compounded upon more hearsay. It is beyond me that this has got this far and things that are important are sidelined: like the $2,000,000 replacement of the alarm system for the GPC buildingss that are going to be demolished in a few years.It would have been cheaper to higher fire marshalls to walk up and down the hall and pull the fire alarms. And all the money they are paying on security so I leave the premsies at exactly 4:00 p.m. rather than 4:30 p.m. is stupid. They must rather have Randy sit alone in a wheel chair for hours and hours and get bedsores than let him be with me. He never had sores when I had access to him everyday. I would massage his legs and arms and turn him a bit. I hever saw a nurse at George Pearsojn every do that. And yes he had a bedsore I was told it was gangreen on the heel of his right foot . I saw it, it was circular black hard dried blood with a diameter of one inch. So when I wasn't able to see Rand GPC left him I assume to sit in his wheel chair for ten hours stretches and not move his foot.
I still do not know what terrible harm I did to bandish me from being with Randy during his last months of life. The medical system has not feelings for the living. What terrible thing did I do. Not follow one of their stupid rules: you have to leasve at 4:00 pm and if your leave at 4:30 you will be banned for the rest of your life. That is absurb. And that is what they are doing. All I want is to see her husband; nothing more nothing less. VGH creates guidelines that mean nothing and harm no one. They are all front line workers used to some chaos so why it is directed to me. They can't prove anything, it is all hearsay compounded upon more hearsay. It is beyond me that this has got this far and things that are important are sidelined: like the $2,000,000 replacement of the alarm system for the GPC buildingss that are going to be demolished in a few years.It would have been cheaper to higher fire marshalls to walk up and down the hall and pull the fire alarms. And all the money they are paying on security so I leave the premsies at exactly 4:00 p.m. rather than 4:30 p.m. is stupid. They must rather have Randy sit alone in a wheel chair for hours and hours and get bedsores than let him be with me. He never had sores when I had access to him everyday. I would massage his legs and arms and turn him a bit. I hever saw a nurse at George Pearsojn every do that. And yes he had a bedsore I was told it was gangreen on the heel of his right foot . I saw it, it was circular black hard dried blood with a diameter of one inch. So when I wasn't able to see Rand GPC left him I assume to sit in his wheel chair for ten hours stretches and not move his foot.
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
Randy is still alive
On Friday Randy was transferred from GPC to VGH as he had an infection again. I wasn't able to see him until this afternoon and he looked tired and when he saw me I thought for awhile that he did not recognize him as I hadn't seen him because of the total banning. However, when he started to cry I knew he recognized me and I told him that I would be back on Wednesday to see him. When I am with him holding his hand I am always at peace. Why can't he just be at home with me. I was told he had septis, the leading cause of death in ICU in the United States. He also had a very large black sore on his heel of his foot. This could have been caused by his nurses not moving him for hour and hours when he is sitting in his wheelchair.
My darling Randy.
And they make us this terrible story about me and even when he is on his death bed they will not allow me at his bedside unlike any other hospital.
Even a secretary lied in an affidavit to discredit me. Lies generated by security did not upset me nearly as much as the lies from her. I only met her once for a few seconds so where did she get all her phantom information . Or does a VCH lawyer write an affidavit and say sign it and employees do even if the information is false.
My darling Randy.
And they make us this terrible story about me and even when he is on his death bed they will not allow me at his bedside unlike any other hospital.
Even a secretary lied in an affidavit to discredit me. Lies generated by security did not upset me nearly as much as the lies from her. I only met her once for a few seconds so where did she get all her phantom information . Or does a VCH lawyer write an affidavit and say sign it and employees do even if the information is false.
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Star Chamber (VCH)
Star Chamber
An ancient high court of England, controlled by the monarch, which was abolished in 1641 by Parliament for abuses of power.
The English court of Star Chamber was created by King Henry VII in 1487 and was named for a room with stars painted on the ceiling in the royal palace of Westminster where the court sat. The Star Chamber was an instrument of the monarch and consisted of royal councillors and two royal judges. The jurisdiction of the court was based on the royal prerogative of administering justice in cases not remediable in the regular courts of law.
The Star Chamber originally assisted with some administrative matters, but by the 1530s it had become a pure court, relieving the king of the burden of hearing cases personally. It was a court of Equity, granting remedies unavailable in the common-law courts. As such, the court was an informal body that dispensed with "due process" as it was then understood.
During Henry VII's reign (1485–1509), about half the cases involved real property. During the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the Star Chamber became a useful tool in dealing with cases involving members of the aristocracy who often defied the authority of the regular courts. It was during this period, moreover, that the court acquired criminal jurisdiction, hearing cases on issues concerning the security of the realm, such as Sedition, criminal libel, conspiracy, and forgery. Later, Fraud and the punishment of judges came within its jurisdiction.
The importance of the Star Chamber increased during the reigns of James I (1603–25) and Charles I (1625–49). Under Archbishop William Laud, the court became a tool of royal oppression, seeking out and punishing religious and political dissidents. In the 1630s Laud used the Star Chamber to persecute a group of Puritan leaders, most of whom came from the gentry, subjecting them to the pillory and Corporal Punishment. Though the Star Chamber could not mete out Capital Punishment, it inflicted everything short of death upon those found guilty. During this time the court met in secret, extracting evidence by torturing witnesses and handing out punishments that included mutilation, life imprisonment, and enormous fines. It turned equity's traditionally broad discretion into a complete disregard for the law. The Star Chamber sometimes acted on mere rumors in order to suppress opposition to the king.
The Star Chamber's Arbitrary use of power and the cruel punishments it inflicted produced a wave of reaction against it from Puritans, advocates of common-law courts, and others opposed to the reign of Charles I. In 1641 the Long Parliament abolished the court and made reparations to some of its victims.
The term star chamber has come to mean any lawless and oppressive tribunal, especially one that meets in secret. The constitutional concept of Due Process of Law is in part a reaction to the arbitrary use of judicial power displayed by the Star Chamber.
Guy, J. A. 1977. The Cardinal's Court: The Impact of Thomas Wolsey in Star Chamber. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.
An ancient high court of England, controlled by the monarch, which was abolished in 1641 by Parliament for abuses of power.
The English court of Star Chamber was created by King Henry VII in 1487 and was named for a room with stars painted on the ceiling in the royal palace of Westminster where the court sat. The Star Chamber was an instrument of the monarch and consisted of royal councillors and two royal judges. The jurisdiction of the court was based on the royal prerogative of administering justice in cases not remediable in the regular courts of law.
The Star Chamber originally assisted with some administrative matters, but by the 1530s it had become a pure court, relieving the king of the burden of hearing cases personally. It was a court of Equity, granting remedies unavailable in the common-law courts. As such, the court was an informal body that dispensed with "due process" as it was then understood.
During Henry VII's reign (1485–1509), about half the cases involved real property. During the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, the Star Chamber became a useful tool in dealing with cases involving members of the aristocracy who often defied the authority of the regular courts. It was during this period, moreover, that the court acquired criminal jurisdiction, hearing cases on issues concerning the security of the realm, such as Sedition, criminal libel, conspiracy, and forgery. Later, Fraud and the punishment of judges came within its jurisdiction.
The importance of the Star Chamber increased during the reigns of James I (1603–25) and Charles I (1625–49). Under Archbishop William Laud, the court became a tool of royal oppression, seeking out and punishing religious and political dissidents. In the 1630s Laud used the Star Chamber to persecute a group of Puritan leaders, most of whom came from the gentry, subjecting them to the pillory and Corporal Punishment. Though the Star Chamber could not mete out Capital Punishment, it inflicted everything short of death upon those found guilty. During this time the court met in secret, extracting evidence by torturing witnesses and handing out punishments that included mutilation, life imprisonment, and enormous fines. It turned equity's traditionally broad discretion into a complete disregard for the law. The Star Chamber sometimes acted on mere rumors in order to suppress opposition to the king.
The Star Chamber's Arbitrary use of power and the cruel punishments it inflicted produced a wave of reaction against it from Puritans, advocates of common-law courts, and others opposed to the reign of Charles I. In 1641 the Long Parliament abolished the court and made reparations to some of its victims.
The term star chamber has come to mean any lawless and oppressive tribunal, especially one that meets in secret. The constitutional concept of Due Process of Law is in part a reaction to the arbitrary use of judicial power displayed by the Star Chamber.
Further readings
Elton, G. R. 1974. Star Chamber Stories. New York: Barnes & Noble.Guy, J. A. 1977. The Cardinal's Court: The Impact of Thomas Wolsey in Star Chamber. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.
West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)