edgeofmadness.me

Since social media is going crazy with posts being deleted, I have decided to duplicate my posts on a new website. I have reserved the name: edgeofmadness.me The name was inspired from Dr. Jordan Peterson when he described his experiences with dealing with his litigations. He said they drove him to the "edge of madness." I went past the edge of madness as I did not have a battery of lawyers, or money, or family, or colleagues, or inside knowlege to support me like Dr. Peterson had. And I was thirty years older than him. I was on my own trying to cope while suffering from acute PTSD. It was untenable. I went to revist the definition of what "doubling down" meant. It means to agressively go after someone. Thank you Joel Morris, the lead litigator, for the Canadian Medical Physicians Association, for threatening me. Since I really did not know what Joel meant at the time, technically I should not describe it as a threat.

Testing to see if posts show up

Testing

Equality and the courts

I keep thinking about equality. One thing I know for sure is that there is no equality in the courts. If each party to a litigation has a lawyer then the process might be defined as being equal. But what about those that do not have a lawyer. How could that even remotely be considered equal. I am advocating that no one should be allowed in a higher court like the supreme court or appeal court unless they are represented by a lawyer. Then equality will be a bit more equal.

Fox News Threatens Tucker Carlson: We'll Release The Texts That Got You ...

Why David Bell would not give me copies of "irrelevant" documents ...

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/business/media/tucker-carlson-dominion-fox-news.html?smid=url-share

When are emails not relevant.

I was told by David Bell, lawyer for the Vancouver Health Authority, that emails and other notes were not relevant. This was against my understanding of what discovery of documents meant in a litigation proceeding. Each party has to disclose everything even the kitchen sink. If the documents were not relevant who decides what is relevant. It seems that David Bell decides what is relevant or is not relevant. Does that mean David Bell will only produce documents that are good for his client and other documents that could provide evidence to the detriment of Bell's client do not have to be disclosed. This is bizarre. In the Dominion v. Fox case, Tucker Carlson produced all his emails i.e. the kitchen sink. I would assume that it would have been up to Dominion to decide if documents are relevant or not. Maybe in the US document discovery is different than in Canada. I am very confused.

Testing to see why my posts went missing XXX

Testing to see why my posts went missing