A terrible mistake

I made a terrible mistake.  I decided that since VCHA would not allow me to see Carolanne, a resident-patient at George Pearson Centre, that I would go by way of a  petition :  a court action.  Wrong move. I did not count on VCHA getting to Carolanne who said she did not want to see me.  They convinced Carolanne that I would get into trouble if I tried to see her. I could not barge in to see her again as she was put under heavy supervision. And I am afraid of violence from Paladin Security.  I told the lawyers for VCHA that their client was forcing Carolanne to say she did not want to see me because I would get into trouble ... and they did nothing.  I did ask Carolanne if she told Dr. Hay, her primary physician appointed by the state (VCHA) if Dr. Hay asked her if she wanted to see me and she said that she told him yes.  Dr. Hay did not do anything either for me to access Carolanne and neither did he attempt to contact me although I emailed him on more than one occasion asking to see Carolanne and her wanting to see me. In furtherance, the good Dr. Hay avoided service of the action I commenced for Randy as he too was Randy's physician appointed by the state.  For a year he did this. Do you have any idea how much a document processing company charges for attempting service.  Dr. Hay owes Randy $big time.  He is a professional, and he hides from a court process. He should be criminally charged with obstruction.  He knew what was wanting to being served on him as I sent him copies by email, left voice mails, faxed him, mailed the documents by post, and personally delivering them to his office.  I even made sure his lawyer knew about the document. The College of Physician and Surgeons should charge him with unprofessional conduct.  Carolanne is a quad whose family abandoned her decades ago.  She had a boyfriend Vince, but he died a few years ago from a heart attack.  The only contact she has with the real world is me. She now has a trach and cannot talk, nor can she write. She haunts me adding to my persistent complex bereavement.

The defendants who are saying that I am well are Dr. Mark Roberts and Dr. James Dunn.  And Dr. Georgia Nemetz, a respected psychologist: a graduate from York House School. None of them have examined me, but they just know. This must be defamation.  I am "not-well" so why are they telling the Supreme Court of British Columbia that I am well. But then they might not know how to search the internet to read what persistent complex bereavement is.

As for the Public Guardian and Trustee, she says that she acted in good faith, I say she abused her power.  Telling me that the enduring power of attorney I had for my husband had to be revoked because I MIGHT mismanage my husband's money is insulting and ridiculous.  This decision was made when my husband was within 9 days of him dying. They knew he was imminent and they did this anyways. Catherine Romaniuk is the Public Guardian and Trustee.  There is a report written by the Ombudsperson called No Longer Your Decision. The Report was critical of both VCHA and the PGT.  The investigation of me was done by a twenty-nine-year-old PGT employee who is most likely still living with his parents.  I know of no other reason for his immaturity i.e. stupidity.  The PGT does what VCHA instructs them what to do.  Whatever VCHA Risk Management wants, Risk Management gets.  Have gun, will travel. And the PGT cannot come up with new evidence as they already declared what evidence they have.  Even after Randy died the PGT was questioning the validity of his will which was made a decade earlier. As if I forged the Will.  They mentioned the possibility of administering the will which would mean that they can revoke a Will as easily as they could revoke a power of attorney..  Administering a will is only done when there is no will.