Justice delayed is Justice denied.

 When a lawyer in an estate says when he refuses to challenge a administrator who has conflicts by saying such conflicts will be decided at the passing of accounts, this to me is a perversion of justice.  Justice is delayed and full Justice will be denied.  The value of the justice will be lessened when a lawyer in an estate refuses to challenge an administrator who has conflicts of interest, stating that such conflicts will be addressed during the passing of accounts. I consider this a perversion of justice. Delaying justice only serves to erode its value. As a result, the administrator gains more than the other beneficiaries, while the lawyers profit from postponing their involvement until the passing of accounts, ensuring a quick return on their minimal investment. This situation is corrupt. Often, the beneficiaries may not even be aware that the administrator has conflicts of interest, and the estate is entitled to reimbursement for self-dealing, such as using estate resources for a trip to Las Vegas. The administrator benefits more than the other beneficiaries, and the lawyers benefit by delaying most of their work until the passing of accounts, which assures them a fast profit on their minimal investment.  It is corrupt. For the most part, the beneficiaries might not even know that the administrator has conflicts and the estate is entitled to be reimbursed for self-dealing, for example, using an estate vehicle for a trip to Las Vegas.