I think I've overcome my overwhelming confusion. It is over lawyers and their hateful behaviour and how it negatively affects society when they use CBA to probate an estate. This is a pattern that most estate lawyers use, clients are profit centers. They are not concerned that CBA erodes the rule of law. It is evil. Money over fiduciary trust. To say it is efficient is a lie. In the longrun costs are higher. CBA is morally illegal. And, it is becoming mainstream as clients are not even told by their lawyers that they are using CBA. Trust me you are told. And when clients find out, if they ever find out, it is too late to say no. You are committed to an outrageous legal bill. If you as a client have no want of honesty and no respect for the law, you cheer in the ignorance that you are getting an ill-sought benefit. Or you fall into the category that "there is a sucker born every minute." meaning you. Anger. Horrorfic humilitation. Not what I signed up for. Bottom line: CBA cuts procedural process. Forget about challenging an unfit administtrator, we will wait until the passing of accounts, more legal fees. There is no savings. There is no best practice. If there is no due process, there is no law.
CBA model, cost benefit analysis, a slow creep by estate lawyers since the 1980s.
