I was told by a medical profession that the overwhelming stress I am under would kill me. When I told this to the parties involved in my litigation all they did was put more stress on me by deciding to use the courts to make the decision. Judges are not medical experts. Letters from my doctors were not enough. The litigation involves Vancouver Coastal Health. The VCHA does not believe its own physicians.
This morning was exceptionally bad. I woke up soaking wet. I changed my clothes and I am now freezing cold. My temperature is 35.7 so I do not have a fever. My hair is soaking wet and my teeth hurt. I mostly drink green tea and force myself to eat one avocado a day.
Gone ballistic scenarios. Activist by default. audreyjlaferriere@gmail.com phone: 604-321-2276,do not leave voice mail http://voiceofgoneballistic.blogspot.com 207-5524 Cambie Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5Z 3A2 Everything posted I believe to be true. If not, please let me know.
Search This Blog
Saturday, March 14, 2020
Sunday, February 23, 2020
Not one day off
On February 20 2020 I was in court on an application that failed. The very next day Joel is demanding more. I feel I am being made ready for the kill. The CMPA wants to protect the reputation of the medical profession and to do so has to do everything to make sure that I do not continue with the case. I can only do so much with my limited resources and suffering from PTSD only makes any situation worse.
Saturday, February 22, 2020
Unpleasant experience
On Thursday February 20 2010 I had an unpleasant experience at court. I can't understand why Dr. James Dunne can't just say that he was forced by Vancouver Coastal Health Authority to put a DNR Order on my husband. He is of retirement age so nothing can happen to him. And when I asked Dr. Dunne in front of a witness to take the Order off, he refused. He said it was not his decision to make. Physicians are independent and not subject to do what the health authority thinks best for its bottom line.
Why is it so difficult for him to tell the truth.
Why is it so difficult for him to tell the truth.
Wednesday, February 12, 2020
duping delight ... gaslighting
I came across what "duping delight" means.(from post Nov 11, 2019) It is what happened to me
at the hands of the VCHA. From social workers, administrators, nurses
and a physician when they asserted that I had no legal rights regarding
my husband.
Duping delight is what happens when a person in a position of power looks down on you and displays a half-smile (or a quarter-smile). When this would happen to me I was taken aback as I believed this was not true. How could I not have any rights when it concerned my husband. And after all these years I found out that they were correct.
VCHA could have you banned and your power of attorney and representation agreement revoked based on collateral (snowflake) gossip without even telling you aforehand. The PGT is supposed to be independent but it does what VCHA tells it.
I was talking to a resident from George Pearson Centre recently and was told that no one complains as they will be punished. The only problem with that reasoning is that if patients are compliant then it is easier to kill them.
And now I have been told (November 8, 2019) that I have to pay advanced costs in the amount of $16,000 by December 31 2019 to VCHA/PGT or my application/case (pstd appeal) against the health authority and the PGT or else the appeal cannot go forward. So what is the point. You do the right thing and you are blocked by lack of money. I fear that I will never get a court decision.
............
I also would like you to listen to minutes 2 to 10 on YouTube which will tell you that DNRs could hasten your death. What Does that DNR Really Mean? Dr. F. Mararchi. Posted June 29 2019.
..........
DNRs are dangerous for patients with pneumonia, trauma, strokes, vascular problems and other treatable conditions, according to studies in the Archives of Internal Medicine and Critical Care Medicine. An analysis of California hospitals published found that patients had higher death rates in hospitals that encourage DNRs. My take is that if a patient does not agree to a DNR then the health authority coerce patients to agree to a DNR. VCHA never tells a patient why a DNR is dangerous.
On 18 November 2013 I was with my husband who was begging me to save his life. Dr. Dunn was ordered by VGH to put a DNR on my husband and no health professional at GPC would give him any oxygen so he could live. Only later I learned that DNRs can be put on patients without the patient's consent. That is why the College did not do anything to Dr. Dunne when I reported him. The College did not explain to me that this was policy. If the public knew there whould be outrage.
February 13/2020
And it is getting got worse. I withdrew the ptsd cost appeal as I was told there would be no costs if I did and now the defendants have applied for costs. The lawyers are David Doig, Cameron Wong, Joel Morris, David Bell, Murray Wolf. They did not have to do this. From the beginning of the action, they did everything to demoralize me rather than to seek out the truth.
voiceofgoneballistic.blogspot.com 604.321.2276 (do not leave message)
comments: AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca (David Eby, Attorney-General)1-250-387-1866
Duping delight is what happens when a person in a position of power looks down on you and displays a half-smile (or a quarter-smile). When this would happen to me I was taken aback as I believed this was not true. How could I not have any rights when it concerned my husband. And after all these years I found out that they were correct.
VCHA could have you banned and your power of attorney and representation agreement revoked based on collateral (snowflake) gossip without even telling you aforehand. The PGT is supposed to be independent but it does what VCHA tells it.
I was talking to a resident from George Pearson Centre recently and was told that no one complains as they will be punished. The only problem with that reasoning is that if patients are compliant then it is easier to kill them.
And now I have been told (November 8, 2019) that I have to pay advanced costs in the amount of $16,000 by December 31 2019 to VCHA/PGT or my application/case (pstd appeal) against the health authority and the PGT or else the appeal cannot go forward. So what is the point. You do the right thing and you are blocked by lack of money. I fear that I will never get a court decision.
............
I also would like you to listen to minutes 2 to 10 on YouTube which will tell you that DNRs could hasten your death. What Does that DNR Really Mean? Dr. F. Mararchi. Posted June 29 2019.
..........
DNRs are dangerous for patients with pneumonia, trauma, strokes, vascular problems and other treatable conditions, according to studies in the Archives of Internal Medicine and Critical Care Medicine. An analysis of California hospitals published found that patients had higher death rates in hospitals that encourage DNRs. My take is that if a patient does not agree to a DNR then the health authority coerce patients to agree to a DNR. VCHA never tells a patient why a DNR is dangerous.
On 18 November 2013 I was with my husband who was begging me to save his life. Dr. Dunn was ordered by VGH to put a DNR on my husband and no health professional at GPC would give him any oxygen so he could live. Only later I learned that DNRs can be put on patients without the patient's consent. That is why the College did not do anything to Dr. Dunne when I reported him. The College did not explain to me that this was policy. If the public knew there whould be outrage.
February 13/2020
And it is getting got worse. I withdrew the ptsd cost appeal as I was told there would be no costs if I did and now the defendants have applied for costs. The lawyers are David Doig, Cameron Wong, Joel Morris, David Bell, Murray Wolf. They did not have to do this. From the beginning of the action, they did everything to demoralize me rather than to seek out the truth.
voiceofgoneballistic.blogspot.com 604.321.2276 (do not leave message)
comments: AG.Minister@gov.bc.ca (David Eby, Attorney-General)1-250-387-1866
Labels:
Cameron Wong,
David Bell,
David Doig,
Joel Morris,
Murray Wolf
Tuesday, January 21, 2020
Banning is illegal for residents in care facilities but the health authorities disagree with the law.
I remember saying that Randy had the right to have visitors and yet VCHA said that he could not have visitors. Although the law says that residents can have visitors VCHA disagrees with the law. And to make it more upsetting in my case I was advocating for my husband to live as he was being subjected to unlawful DNRs. The very first day of me seeing the head nurse at George Pearson Center she said that she could make sure that I never see Randy again even on his death bed which came to pass.
I was banned most of the years that Randy was imprisoned at George Pearson Centre. I remember asking a RN how often are visitors banned and she said it was noticeable. Visitors just go away because they do not what to do. All VCHA has to say is that the hospital is on private property and visitors and patients believe it. And no records and no records are available to know how many people are subject to this cruelity. No one is ever charged in BC but the police might attend and firmly ask you to leave.
How cruel it is for everyone concerned. The anger never goes away. Even though my husband has been death since 2014 the forever banning is still in effect. The details of my banning are nothing more than double hearsay and employees agreeing to say things to protect their jobs. So much for professionalism in the medical profession. Just agree to snowflake allegations and remain part of our network to protect each other. Most nurses and LPNs with overtime make $100,000 a year not counting their benefits.
What keeps me going is what a nurse said to me at George Pearson Centre, of all the residents and family members, Randy and I were the easiest and the most co-operative to get along with. So I ask what was the problem.
---------------------------------
There were over 900 comments to a report on the CBC news on November 23 2019 about Mary Sardelis.
Hon. Raymond Cho
Ministry for Seniors and Accessibility
Frost Building South
6th Floor
7 Queen’s Park Cres.
Toronto, ON M7A 1Y7
November 28, 2019
Dear Minister Cho,
I’m writing to request a full investigation into the use of trespass orders against family members in retirement homes, and for the results to be made public.
It was disconcerting to learn that some retirement homes are using sections of Ontario’s trespass law to ban family members from visiting their relatives when they have raised concerns about their loved ones’ living conditions.
The Advocacy Centre for the Elderly (ACE), an organization specializing in legal services for seniors, has been very clear: the use of trespass orders to bar family members from retirement homes is illegal.
I was deeply moved by the situation of Mary Sardelis, who was banned from seeing her 97-year-old mother Voula for 316 days. The two were separated at Christmas, Thanksgiving, and even for Voula’s birthday.
Mary’s situation, however, is far from an isolated incident - it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Jane Meadus, a lawyer with ACE, estimates that she has received more than one call a week with complaints of retirement homes or long-term care facilities using trespass orders to bar family members from visiting.
It is vital for both individual cases and the overall practice to be investigated.

Joel Harden
Official Opposition Critic for Seniors
MPP for Ottawa Centre
I was banned most of the years that Randy was imprisoned at George Pearson Centre. I remember asking a RN how often are visitors banned and she said it was noticeable. Visitors just go away because they do not what to do. All VCHA has to say is that the hospital is on private property and visitors and patients believe it. And no records and no records are available to know how many people are subject to this cruelity. No one is ever charged in BC but the police might attend and firmly ask you to leave.
How cruel it is for everyone concerned. The anger never goes away. Even though my husband has been death since 2014 the forever banning is still in effect. The details of my banning are nothing more than double hearsay and employees agreeing to say things to protect their jobs. So much for professionalism in the medical profession. Just agree to snowflake allegations and remain part of our network to protect each other. Most nurses and LPNs with overtime make $100,000 a year not counting their benefits.
What keeps me going is what a nurse said to me at George Pearson Centre, of all the residents and family members, Randy and I were the easiest and the most co-operative to get along with. So I ask what was the problem.
---------------------------------
There were over 900 comments to a report on the CBC news on November 23 2019 about Mary Sardelis.
Hon. Raymond Cho
Ministry for Seniors and Accessibility
Frost Building South
6th Floor
7 Queen’s Park Cres.
Toronto, ON M7A 1Y7
November 28, 2019
Dear Minister Cho,
I’m writing to request a full investigation into the use of trespass orders against family members in retirement homes, and for the results to be made public.
It was disconcerting to learn that some retirement homes are using sections of Ontario’s trespass law to ban family members from visiting their relatives when they have raised concerns about their loved ones’ living conditions.
The Advocacy Centre for the Elderly (ACE), an organization specializing in legal services for seniors, has been very clear: the use of trespass orders to bar family members from retirement homes is illegal.
I was deeply moved by the situation of Mary Sardelis, who was banned from seeing her 97-year-old mother Voula for 316 days. The two were separated at Christmas, Thanksgiving, and even for Voula’s birthday.
Mary’s situation, however, is far from an isolated incident - it’s only the tip of the iceberg. Jane Meadus, a lawyer with ACE, estimates that she has received more than one call a week with complaints of retirement homes or long-term care facilities using trespass orders to bar family members from visiting.
It is vital for both individual cases and the overall practice to be investigated.

Joel Harden
Official Opposition Critic for Seniors
MPP for Ottawa Centre
Saturday, January 18, 2020
Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network
January 17 2020
Another year has come and gone—and with it another year of patients and families in crisis, seeking assistance. This is the result of physicians notifying families that they are denying life-affirming care to their loved one
.
Sadly, there is no end in sight to an increasing utilitarian worldview towards medically weak patients, while at the same time, traumatizing families who are trying to provide appropriate treatment.
Make no mistake, hospital administrators are pressuring physicians to contain cost. Consequently, patients who were once afforded routine medical therapies are now being denied that same care. In other words, whether a patient receives or doesn’t receive certain treatment can be decided by health care economics.
All life is inherently valuable, and patients, more than anything, need time to recover, something hospital administrators, often times are unwilling to provide.
Bobby Schindler
Terri Schiavo Life & Hope Network
John Hopkins (2018): medical errors are the third leading cause of death.
Monday, January 13, 2020
the litigation
The Hasson Diab case. He is suing the government for $90 million dollars for intentional infliction of emotional distress and breaches of charter rights. Exactly what happened to me.
And I like Diab initially only wanted a proper investigation of the allegations.
These harms extend to what a health authority will do with the aid of other government bodies like the public guardian and trustee and WorkSafe and an expert psychologist who never talked to me and an expert in security who was on the monthly payroll of VCHA who robbed me of my rights arrived by them from gossip and the want of VCHA.
My husband's lawyer told VCHA that he was of the opinion that I might not look after my husband's finances properly so VCHA arranged with the public guardian and trustee to revoke my husband's enduring power of attorney.
I never had access to my husband's money as this lawyer had it and when I asked him for help to get additional nursing/companion support for him at George Pearson Centre he refused. After all this time Mr. Doig still has not given me an accounting of what he did with Randy's money. He did not even give an accounting to the public guardian and trustee. The agenda of the public guardian and trustee in collusion with VCHA was to remove me as my husband's guardian and Mr. Doig helped them.
And then there was Dr. Dunn who insisted that it was not his decision to put a DNR on Randy but rather it was VCHA's. Therefore he did not get Randy's permission. A little known secret is that a patient doe not have to agree to a DNR. DNRs are used to hasten death by not providing treatment to help a patient live. I was there when I saw my husband in respiratory distress and no medical person would help him because he had a DNR on him. I saved his life by calling 911. He lived six more months. He could have lived longer but I had no access to him as VCHA and WorkSafe had me banned from all VCHA facilities in 2014 and that banning is still in effect.
One does not have to look at international abuses of rights, you can find them in your own backyard.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)