I wonder if VCHA defamed me ... everyone involved seemed to conspire to discredit me

​ Rupert Murdoch's son Lachlan ends Australian defamation suit

 

READ: The story here about Rupert Murdoch's son and his defamation case.

Cancellation/Suspension of an Enduring Power of Attorney cont'd

 I spent time again reviewing the legislation on how the PGT/VCHA could have cancelled/suspended my Enduring Power of |Attorney.  I couldn't find anything in the legislative Acts.  The only one who could have rescinded my EPA would have been my husband. In the "world" of the PGT, maybe there is a regulation that says it can cancel an EPA but there would have to be some "paperwork."  This serious legal issue could be why the Defendant Litigants pushed for this litigation to be dismissed. They wanted it forgotten and hidden in the pleadings.  I remember complaining to the Ombudsperson Mr.Chalke in person about the PGT and he said I could appeal it.  What arrogance. I remember looking at him in dismay.  The PGT can make a mistake maybe by design and I could appeal it. Mistakes by the PGT  should not have happened in the first place. But then maybe the PGT deliberately did this, knowing that I would never appeal it or even know I could appeal it as I had no money and it would be impossible to hire a lawyer. At no time before the Certificate of Incapability was issued did the PGT say that they were going to rescind the EPA by way of a secret administrative court.  

The Neall Epstein case and me

 The more I think about what VCHA tried to do to me i.e. attempting to charge me with criminal harassment, the more scared I feel.  How could it defame me. And, it was done with the advice of their lawyers or one of their risk management people. It had to be both. I once asked risk management for a list of its employees and what university degrees each had and I never received a reply.  I was driven to be so crazy in my head I was looking for "why."  I wanted to know if these employees had degrees in "behavioural psychology."  A degree in how to control people "brainwashing." How to "gaslight." I still would like to know.  Such information should be public knowledge.  And I feel safe that the police refused to proceed with the bogus charge.Those with power forget that it only takes one person to derail them. In my case two burly police officers.

Cure For The Monday Blues The King v. Neall Epstein

The King v. Neall Epstein (go to 12.20.00 minute on the YouTube video).

I am more than angry.  Towards the end of the video, it was pointed out that Neall Epstein if found guilty of nonsense he could have lost his job as a teacher and he would lose $20,000 paying a lawyer for defending his case at trial without any recourse to get the money reimbursed.  

This is what Dr. Dunne attempted to do to me. I remember when the burly police officers were at my residence.  A neighbour told me later that there were two police cars there, and she wanted to know what the two burly police officers wanted.  The police briefly spoke to me and left. This attempt to criminally charge me should be enough for Dr. Dunne to have his medical licence taken away from him considering he has a higher standard of conduct in the eyes of the courts to behave. I do not blame Dr. Dunne, I blame VCHA and their lawyer, David Bell.  I remember saying to the burly police officers why were they trying to criminally charge me as this should be civil.  I might have been wrong about that as I do not know if you can sue someone civilly for harassment.  But then I am not a lawyer.  

Depending on the wordsmithing of what happened to Randy and me our story is far more bizarrely hilarious than of Epstein's.  It might have cost him $20,000 for legal costs, but it cost me substantially more. I wanted the case to be dropped as I was ill but the lawyers refused. I sent Morris an email and he never answered it.  Morris was the lawyer who took the position of being the spokesperson for all the ligating lawyers and he was being paid by the union (the insurer for the physicians).  I went over their heads and contacted Victoria. I had to be punished. 

When Nurse Ratchet decided to come after me, I was nearly 70 years old and weighed 110 pounds.  A far cry from the 180 pounds I weighed before Randy was imprisoned by VCHA. I remember the first social worker I talked to at VCHA who said that I should just forget about Randy as they would look after him.  I do not know who "they" were but I wasn't going to talk to that social worker ever again. Later my lawyer said Randy was imprisoned.  During the six months Randy was at VGH, I visited him every single day, taking a bus from the far easterly side of Burnaby.  I had no money, and I remember standing on the street near VGH asking for money so that I could pay for the fee ($20.00) rent now and then so that Randy could have access to paid TV.  I remember the social worker nurse said that Randy did not qualify for a free TV.  Randy was disabled, bedridden, and he could not talk. I was always exhausted and I would fall asleep on his bed, at the end of his bed curled up in a fetal position. The nurses would pass by and cover me.

 The only reason Randy lived so long was that VGH was a teaching hospital, and he was used as a specimen as he had complex injuries for the training of new physicians.  I knew that at that time, and I was grateful to the young doctors for keeping him alive.  Dr. Dunne should have been charged for attempting to charge me falsely criminally.  He got off lightly.  Maybe he should be charged now.  VCH should be charged as an accessory as well. I remember what one of the burly police officers said to me at that time but I do not know if it was confidential or not. The burly two police officers used "discretion" which was absent in the Epstein case.

PS  I was thinking about why VCHA wanted me to be charged with criminal harassment.  It would make me a criminal and the PGT would take over Randy's care.  And during the interim, from being charged to becoming convicted, I would become more than a basket case than I was already. How evil.

The King v. Neall Epstein (2023 Quebec)

 How interesting. From reading about the case of the King v. Neall Epstein (Rebel News and MSN Canada Press (March 10, 2023)) I learned what criminal harassment is. It involves stalking.  

During my interaction with Vancouver Coastal Health, it went so far as to have Dr. Dunne attempt to lay a criminal charge against me for criminal harassment. I did not follow Dr. Dunne around.  Truth is if I saw him on the street today I won't be able to recognize him. Burly police officers showed up at my door. So where did Dr. Dunne get the education to do that. I suspect it was from his employer, VCH, and its lawyer, David Bell. Maybe Joe Morris of Harper Gray had something to do with it as he was the lawyer for the union that defends physicians. I guess this is what is called co-opted "litigation strategy." Or, win by any means possible. Just gaslight the woman from her rights. This should be easy as she has PTSD.

But then thinking back maybe criminal harassment includes emails. Dr. Dunne said I sent him what could be interpreted as hundreds of emails. He referred to these emails in an affidavit. When I asked for the emails the lawyers for him (VCH) said I was not entitled to them. The litigation involved an injunction wherein I wanted to see my husband and such evidence did not have to be given to me. In other words, you can lie in affidavits and get away with it. I sent a lot of emails but they were mostly directed to VCHA not Dr. Dunne.

The interesting thing about the King v. Neall Epstein case (Justice Galiatsatos) said that the complainant should have been charged with various criminal charges, not Neall Epstein.

When my litigation started I really really really believed that the lawyers would tell VCH that they were being ridiculous and for them to just let me see my husband. My husband was dying so why couldn't I see him. But of course, lawyers just do what their clients tell them. All of us know that this is not true.  

Romilda ANG

 I want to know why Randy was put in a private room at George Pearson Centre?

Romilda was the manager at GPC, and she told me to remove most of Randy's possessions.

Previously, Randy had a space in an open ward with only a tiny wardrobe cupboard. The private room had a lot of space.

She was trying to make her life easier as she knew Randy was going to die.  A body is easier to dispose of if a dead person does not have any possessions.

  

Days lost ... and David Bell

 These past few days have been a “lost.” On Monday I could not sleep as I was afraid I would not wake up as I had to be at court at 8:45 am Tuesday.  The case was adjourned/cancelled.  It took me until now to feel like I recovered from the lack of sleep.  I am receiving at least 200 emails a day, mostly informational types, things I am interested in but have no time to read them.  Call it “overload.”  I have been trying to get FOI information from VGH, but nothing is forthcoming. VCHA successfully dismissed my litigation, and now they are keeping back information, so I cannot understand what happened. These emails would surely tell me. No one else is interested; I just want to know.  What piqued my interest in this now history is that David Bell, the lawyer for VCHA, while in the litigation, did not complete a demand for discovery of documents, that is, give to me all the emails, etc., that VCHA has and which would still be in his possession. I mentioned this to the justice at the dismissal, and she did not deem it important enough to pursue.  She said that it was in all parties' interests for her to decide to dismiss the action.  Whose interest … Later, I asked the court registry if I could get a message to the justice for an explanation, the registry said "no."

xxx  xxx