VCHA and PGT et al
I
searched my email and could not find your email of May 22 2020 I
thought it was agreed that if you did not hear from me when you sent an
email you would contact me. Waiting 20 days is a bit long and from your
email you have assumed that I read the May 22 2020 letter.
These
past months my health has declined. I am exhausted all the time and
am mostly self-isolating myself because I am 75 years old and I am in the vulnerable category. I told you in January that Dr. XXX said he never saw
me so bad that the stress would kill me. You put someone in a cage they will eventually die.
I
also had to deal with my tenancy which only added to my stress. The
last eviction notice contained the evidence of VCHA that said I was
violent and that was justification that I be evicted from my home.
Apparently, although I live on the property alone, Wall Financial is
afraid to send someone here to cut the grass and that is enough to get
me evicted. Evidence of double hearsay presented by VCHA convinced an
overzealousness and inexperienced lawyer to start RTA applications
against me. There times within six months they demanded that I be
evicted. Learning about the tenancy act when I was ill was very time
consuming and difficult. All it did was make my flashbacks worse as the
evidence alleged was what happened six years ago. Employees of VCHA are
very good at presenting evidence that VCHA expects to discredit
someone. And Lawson Lundell was good at bringing up additional false
evidence that caused me distress. However, Lawson Lundell did not comment on the fact that their client's employees were using a choke hold on a trespasser and the trespasser was trying to scream that he could not breathe. I called the police. I interferred with the owner's prorative to control what goes on his property and I had to be evicted. I was treated as though I was an employee rather than a paying tenant or a citizen witnessing violence.
I
also asked you to refer me to a doctor for an assessment re my PTSD and
you have refused to do so. You know it is near impossible to get a
PTSD assessment except by lawyers who have them on their referral list.
To me you refusing is subverting justice. You must know even your own
expert would find that I suffer from the stress your clients put me
under. You know you must not hide evidence from the courts. And you also know that during COVID-19 no assessor will do an assessment by
telecommunication.
And
by chance I read the newspaper reports about what is happening at
George Pearson Centre this past week and that further triggered my
flashbacks. Nothing has changed at GPC. It isn't the group of druggies
running around intimidating patients, it is GPC allowing them to do so.
This group-type was there ten years ago. They allow druggies to do this to mask the abuse that GPC does to individual patients and their families. Do you really think anyone will complain to risk management when GPC allows druggies to APPEAR to run the hospital. Complaints will get you nowhere except to come fearful and compliant.
And I still do not know if Carolanne is alive or dead. Why won't
anyone tell me. I was told by Mr. Bell that the health authority would
not allow him to tell me. And Mr. Bell always does what he is told. How
can such a determination be confidential. No freedom of information.
You
and the other lawyers are trying to have the action dismissed on
technicalities which the court of public opinion would find offensive
and only bring refute to the legal profession and all the defendants.
You have not played fair. You can hide behind the rules of court as to
process but it will not absolve you. My case is about abuse created by
VCHA and who also directed the PGT to cancel my power of attorney and
representation agreement so I could not advocate or see my husband
while he was dying. Your client did nothing except to agree with VCHA
which is against everything a physician is supposed to do as he is to
protect his patient and not do what risk management wants. The words I
remember from your client that it was not his decision to put a
dangerous DNR on my husband and that night if my husband was not
resuscitated by a retired RT he would have died. The only one who can
put a DNR on a patient is his physician. A patient does not have to consent.
Please forward this to your tribe.
|
11:10 AM (1 minute ago)
| ||
| subject: dismissing my action | |||
| |||
