Busting movers: Inside the police raid (Marketplace)

This video is about fraud (scam) were the fraudsters have been charged. Finally, the police are saying that consumer fraud is a civil matter.  

100-year-old D-Day veteran weds 96-year-old bride days after 80th annive...

DNR discussion on TV

VSED and Euthanasia

 In Canada, an autistic 27-year-old suicidal woman known as M.V. — whose judicially approved euthanasia was delayed until at least October by her father’s claim that she does not qualify — is now starving herself to emotionally blackmail the court into allowing her to be killed expeditiously. From the CBC story:

On Tuesday, M.V.’s lawyer Austin Paladeau filed an application with the province’s top court asking for that stay to be lifted because of a “material change in circumstance.”

On May 28, M.V. commenced voluntary stoppage of eating and drinking (VSED).

“VSED is incredibly unpleasant and is increasing my suffering,” reads part of M.V.’s affidavit filed with the application.

“I would greatly prefer to receive MAID to reduce the suffering I have to endure to protect my autonomy in acting out a decision I have already made.”

M.V. says she cannot wait to die until Oct. 7 appeal.

Some thoughts.

• Voluntary stoppage of eating and drinking (VSED) has been suggested previously by activists to people who do not otherwise qualify to be killed or assisted in suicide to risk imminent death and thereby become legally eligible to be made dead. The added twist here is the threat of suicide by starvation as an emotional cudgel to short-circuit normal court procedures.
• M.V. claims that VSED is “incredibly unpleasant and increasing my suffering” — which certainly makes sense since starving to death is agonizing. Yet, VSED is pushed quite vigorously by organizations such as Compassion and Choices (formerly, the Hemlock Society) that claim that it causes little discomfort. Indeed, C & C claims, in its pro-suicide-by-VSED propaganda:

Since VSED is a natural process of dying, individuals can have a range of symptoms and experiences. Unwanted symptoms can typically be managed with medications from the doctor or hospice.

Some people express a sense of peace that they can “stop fighting” and describe feeling euphoria or pleasant light-headedness. Researchers believe there is an analgesic effect caused by dehydration that may explain this response.

Hmm. M.V. certainly doesn’t seem euphoric.

• VSED doesn’t describe dying patients who stop eating as their organs shut down at the end of their lives. That’s a natural process that does not cause suffering. In contrast, the experience of VSED for a suicidal person whose body is not otherwise shutting down would be little different from being locked in a room without food and water for three weeks — which is why palliation is needed. To say the least, C & C dramatically underplays the potential for extreme discomfort.
• Legalization activists promise that strict guidelines protect against abuse. But those limitations — such as they are — are meaningless if a suicidal patient can emotionally blackmail authorities on the threat of pursuing a more agonizing suicide.

Allowing euthanasia and/or assisted suicide unleashes drastic desires in suffering individuals and allows deadly, socially sanctioned actions that would have been unthinkable before doctor-administered or prescribed death became legalized and normalized. This is no longer about “slippery slopes” — it is demonstrated by abundant facts on the ground.

"The Worst Thing Any President Has Done in My Lifetime" | Victor Davis H...

Scotland comes clean using blanket DNRs

According to Slang.org

 According to Slang.org, a prick is a slang term for a jerk or an asshole.  An awful person who gets off being an asshole.

Another definition of what a prick is:  an obnoxious person, an unprincipled and selfish man who high-highedly abuses others, who capriciously exhibits little or no regard for justice.

This prick banned me from seeing my friend who is resident at the Kingsway Continental.  He said that if my friend let me into the building the resident would be EVICTED.  How can a prick keep me from visiting a friend and then threatening a tenant with eviction.  Is the prick breaking the law or is the prick following the law.  Knowing how screwed up the law is, maybe he is lawfully following the law. 

The Horrifying Truth Behind MAID They Aren't Telling You: Don't do MAID, it is water boarding torture.

Fraser Health Authority will not give out autopsy of woman who died by MAID.  Why.

Do not resuscitate orders You do not have to have a euthanasia order, just a DNR order, to die.

DNR at 38 years of age

Finally after all these years my concerns is coming to the forefront.

DNRs are forced on patients.

DNRs means Do Not Treat.

Ken Sim and the Constitution

 I have been under incredible stress these past weeks because of the behavior of Vladimiros Xanthopoulos, a prick who manages a City owned property:  the Kingsway Continental, social housing for low income mostly seniors. The prick is wanting to evict a 70 year old man who has mobility problems and cannot rush to a toilet when he needs to void because the prick has locked up the public access toilet in the building. Paul uses a walker and as Paul is obese he has difficulty rushing to anywhere. The incident was videotaped. It happened in the middle of the night. If he has an urgent uncontrollable need, he pees in a plastic container and then puts it in his basket that is part of his walker.  The videos are in the building for security purposes.  How can peeing in a plastic container be a security issue.  Who complained? And what is wrong with pee anyways, babies pee all the time and they do not get evicted.

The most egregious issue however isn't the peeing it is that the prick has refused me entry to the building to visit the tenant supposedly guilty of this terrible crime meaning so he will be evicted to the state of homelessness. The City is convinced that the RTA will evict my friend otherwise the City would not have authorized this utterly terrible process to happen.  The legal department knew of this crime and did nothing to stop this traumatic process.

A manager cannot prevent a visitor from visiting a tenant unless there is a court order.  But the City of Vancouver is doing it.  I wrote the mayor, the city manager, non-market housing, their legal department educating them but I have heard nothing.  This is a signal to tell the population that it is okay for a landlord to determine who and when a visitor can visit a tenant even if there are laws that say otherwise  nothing will happen to them.  If the City cannot enforce the law in its own building then there is no law.

You cannot trust the administration of mayor Ken Sim and the ABC.  

Stopping me from visiting Paul isn't a simple illegal crime, it is against our Constitution. The part that says we are guaranteed freedom of association.

We are in a totalitarian state policed by landlords. They become the judge, jury and executor arbitrarily.

Arbititarily means they can do what they want because even though there are laws against what they are doing like see the Constitution it is very hard to enforce and in this case how can a visitor enforce the right to visit a tenant. Will the Province call in the military.  Freedom of association is the right of every citizen in Canada. 

My friend is elderly, he needs help with his pending ridiculous eviction for pissing in a plastic container and also he needs support because he is elderly has serious medical conditions and someone has to look out for the vulnerables of our community.  The fact is a landlord does not have to know the reason a visitor wants to visit a tenant; demanding it is called invasion of privacy.  

Vlad is a prick that should be fired and so should Mayor Sim as the buck stops with him.

Vlad the prick is a real prick when he put the notice to evict on Paul's door, Paul did not notice it, did not know an eviction was imminent.  Vlad the prick must have been laughing each time he passed Paul's door knowing Paul did not read the notice as it was still posted on his door therefore Paul would not file a dispute note to contest the eviction. Sick. Sick. Sick. The evidence to this is that on the 15th of April Vlad was running up and down the hall of the Kingsway Continental saying that Paul was being evicted. Whatever happened to confidentiality.  Unbeknown to the prick was that I had helped Paul file a dispute note and it was being sent to the Kingsway Continental by registered mail so the dispute note was within the time limit.  I could not trust the prick to accept personal service so I sent it registered mail.  It is so easy for anyone to lie and say he did not get the dispute note. Look at the shoplifting problem we have, no one is honest any more.

Back to the most egregious issue and that is the Constitution and the disregard that Sim has for it. Sim nauseates me as he has or does make his money on the back of the medically disabled and seniors. Nurse Next Door Home Healthcare Service. His ownership of Nurse Next Door reflects his commitment to addressing healthcare needs in the community. Totally nauseating.  And even Klassen is involved with the new capitalist money maker; the elderly.  Maybe every single person on council has financial affiliations with robbing the elderly. A reporter should investigate this.

The point is me and the Constitution.  No one has the right to deny me visitation.  How dare the City do this.  And I am hopeful that Sim is dethroned from his throne.

It is 11:11 pm Paul just called.  Said he was having terrible dreams of being homeless and on the street.Was this mental torture necessary.  The City should not cause mental distress to a resident in one of its buildings.  All it has done is create a chilling effect on the other tenants so the other tenants are afraid.

Replacement - Trudeau has allowed 2 million immigrants into Canada, what...

Commentary about the April 7 2024 arrest of David ... It is a must see video.

BREAKING: Toronto Police just arrested our reporter David Menzies AGAIN

David Arrested Again April 7 2024

 David has been arrested and jailed again on Sunday April 7 2024 while reporting at a demonstration. The police seem to have gone power mad.  He was arrested for being in a public space. All this craziness is really upsetting me.  

And why is Ezra, the boss of Rebel News, sending out David to report where there might be violence and possible arrests.  David is 61 years old and I am sure there must be others half his age that work at Rebel News that could do this job.

How to create more rental spaces, rent to more than one occupant in one unit, charge 1/3 rent based on household income.

I invite all the landlords to choose among the hundreds of applications they have for a rental unit based on income a tenant earns.  Choice a tenant that earns $100,000 a year and charge rent at 1/3 of income or even 1/2 of income.  The more a tenant earns the least likely that the landlord will suffer financial loss as the tenant can afford to pay his rent and any additional charges like repainting his unit after he paints it black.

Thinking further, a landlord can rent one unit to as many occupants as he wants depending on any legal restrictions.

A landlord could allow ten tenants to a unit.  Average wage in 2023 in Vancouver BC was $25.00 an hour. Using the 1/3 guideline, he should be paying $1,400 a month rent ($16,666 a year rent)

A landlord could pack ten tenants in a rental unit and get 1/3 X $50,000 X 10 = $ 166,666 for one unit of housing using the 1/3 formula as opposed to 1/3 of $50,000 = $16,666 for one occupant.

Realistically four working adults could share a one-bedroom apartment that could generate $66,664 rent a year rather than $16,666. for one tenant. Two people sharing a one bedroom apartment would generate $33,000 for rent.

Packing ten people into each rental unit in Canada would eliminate the housing problem overnight. Landlords would welcome the windfall rent.

 

 

David Menzies the Rebel April 4 2024 court appearance

David appeared at criminal court today to meet the charge of obstructing the police on March 15 2014 at a demonstration because he did not produce his ID fast enough.  His first court appearance.  No one was there: no crown prosecutor; no police witnesses; no disclosure (particulars).  The matter was adjourned to May 1 2024.  

David said he (Rebel News) will be suing the Toronto Police for false arrest, negligent investigating, false imprisonment and assault which are civil complaints. Under the Charter of Rights, the police violated David's freedom of the press, freedom of religion, and freedom of movement.  Years and years of litigation.  What $fun.

see: www.standwithdavid.com

I am sure this also happens daily in Vancouver where police JUST arrest/detain people because they can  believing those arrested will not make them accountable for their flagrant disregard of citizen rights.  Them breaking the law to uphold the law isn't the way it should be.

Exhaustion

 I do not know what is happening.  During the recent weeks, I have been experiencing extreme exhaustion.

All I seem to be doing is sleeping and upon waking wanting a sugar fix. If I go out for an hour or two, as soon as I return to my living space, I must sleep. Sleep is good but sugar is not.  For years I never had granulated white sugar in my house.  These past three weeks, I went through a five-pound bag, mostly by drinking tea. 

MAID in Canada!

Doing Medical Assistance in Dying with No Judicial Oversight.

The secrecy of it.

Viva Frei Vlawg

It is a private thing, not murder

 

justice dies in darkness...

liberty dies in darkness...

democracy dies in darkness...

Computer Nerd

 I have finally found the term to use whenever I am confronted with instructions to consult to go to a web page to find an answer that most probably I will not find as I am not a computer nerd and I do not speak computer nerd language.  My time is worth money and I resent corporations downloading their customer service to the customer's frustration. Try sending an email to the mayor of Vancouver or the chief of police or finding their phone numbers.  Try navigating Rebel News.

The arrest of David Menzies/Income discrimination in housing

 This morning when I woke up in a state of anxiety I reviewed David Menzies' arrest of January 8 2024 and his arrest of March 15 2024. It was a travesty.  The cops knew they were being filmed by Rebel News and they still did the arrests.  What an embarrassment for Canada.  I wonder how many hits the videos got.  Their bad behavior will be forgotten but David's reputation will be tainted forever.  Was he guilty of assaulting a police officer, was he guilty of obstructing police. Who is going to go to the trouble of researching/looking at the videos.  Guilty or not, he is tainted as the public would think why would the police charge anyone unless that person was guilty. 

I do not know why I even bother to view my emails  Each day there is something that I personally relate to causing me to be annoyed.  This time it was about a woman in Campbell River (Vancouver Sun March 21 2024)  She is looking for a new rental and she can't find one because she is not eligible as her income is not enough.  Her income is $2,500 a month and the rental is $1,600.  That means unless you are a high earner, market housing does not have to accept you as a tenant if you have a low income.  Why is it any concern of a landlord to know what your income is as long as you pay your first and last month's rent and the security deposit.  This is blatant discrimination by income. We are talking about shelter that is or should be a human right, not a credit card application. It is up to the renter to determine if he can pay the rent or not. There is no reason for a landlord to know what your salary is. What happened to confidentiality.   

As a side note: Like social housing, market housing should be rent based on household income. Those that rent cheap housing but make a high income should pay 1/3 of their household income for rent.  1/3 of $21,000 (annual rent) is $7000; 1/3 of $99,000 is $33,000. Those that live in cheap housing will quickly upgrade leaving the cheaper housing available to low-income households. I personally know of no one who pays more than 1/3 of their income on rent. But I know those that have paid cash for a new $80,000 car and have $500,000 in their bank accounts while paying $1,000 a month rent. Those that have lived in the same apartment for over ten years. I would live in a rent controlled apartment if I could bank $33,000 a year. 

----------

A solution for the government is to tax household income after rent.  That can be done by taking 1/3 of a householder's income less his rental payment.  If a tenant is paying $1,000 a month and the household has $150,000 a year (or more) income, the difference 1/3 of $150,000 = $50,000, then $50,000 less $12,000 (rent to owner) = $38,000 additional disposal income.  The household pays 1/3 of its income for housing, and there is $100,000 left, enough to live comfortably. This meets the metric that rent should not be more than 1/3 of household income. The government should legislate that they get the difference ($38,000 ) and can use this money to increase the stock of housing for the poor and new immigrants.  

Monday March 18 2024: Canada recognizes Hamas ...

 go to Rebel News and find if you can the podcast by Ezra 

Trudeau's Liberal-NDP cabal vies to become Canada's leading pro-Hamas government

Tue, March 19 2024
I am not sure what the headline means, but it sounds BAD.  
I am convinced that Rebel News has a plan to make sure its news does not reach most of us.What they present is so confusing. This podcast is hidden under SHOWS, then under Ezra Levant.Or go to Latest, Canada.
It looks like it is hidden behind a paywall but it isn't as I was able to click on it and the click worked.Find the podcast if you can.  It should be required listening for everyone.
On March 18 2024 our government decided to ,,,,
Within the podcast it was mentioned that Canada admitted 2.1 million new persons into Canada. No one should be admitted here unless they have a place to live.That means at least 500,000 new homes.  
Hamas provides its own statistics, so we have to believe them.

Side Note:  Did you know that CRIMINAL charges can be made against a police officer if they knowingly arrested someone without proper grounds, they could be charged with obstruction of justice or fabricating evidence.(i.e. without reasonable grounds or with faulty evidence).  Someone please tell David Menzies.



 

Hasn't seen a tree in two years

 Chris Carbert one of the Coutts Four blockage who was arrested said to Ezra Levant that he hasn't seen a tree in two years. He has been in jail in Lethbridge, Alberta.  What happened to the concept of a speedy trial, or bail.  See video Rebel News: Ezra Levant interviews the mother of one of the Coutts Four. Two years without seeing a tree.  What the hell is going on.

EXCLUSIVE: Ezra Levant interviews the mother of one of the Coutts Four

By Ezra Levant

Rebel News Latest David Menzies Arrested

SEARCH:  Rebel News, tab to Latest, read URGENT: Toronto Police Just Arrested David Menzies 15 March 2024.

You hear about the police being idiots, but now there is proof.  In Canada, there is no law that says you have to produce an ID except when driving a motor-vehicle. 

Since David did not produce his ID within a timely matter i.e. seconds, he was criminally charged with obstructing the police. They arrested him and disappeared him.  No one knows where he is.

But you have to look a little bit deeper, see the attitude of the police officer. It is what I tell you. 

50,000 Muslims live in Toronto and they can exercise their right to pray in public  (a ten-minute prayer ritual five times a day).  No ID required.  But David has to produce ID or be arrested.

This is even worse than the reasoning for the secular law passed in Quebec (Bill 21) last month where government employees that are in positions of influence (like teachers) cannot wear religious grab but members of parliament can wear brightly coloured designer turbans (like Jagmeet Singh) to confuse. 

Church and State have to be separate.  

The video has to be watched: the horror of the state coming down on David, taking away his freedom by a nonsense charge.  If the police can do this to David for not producing his ID, they can disappear each of us.

We cannot trust the police.  

   

Love this.

 April 12 2024

Awoman ended up giving birth outside the locked doors of the Sainte-Croix hospital in Drummondville, Que., early Tuesday morning in a turn of events Quebec Health Minister Christian Dubé has since called "unacceptable."

The woman, her husband and two-year-old son mistakenly showed up at the hospital's main entrance instead of heading to the emergency department, a five-minute walk away. 

A security guard working inside the building spotted the family and tried redirecting them with hand signals but did not open the door. It wasn't until a patient alerted staff on the fifth floor that two nurses rushed outside to help the woman as she gave birth on a park bench. 

In a statement to Radio-Canada, authorities at the CIUSS de la Mauricie-et-du-Centre-du-Québec said they're looking into what happened. They said the security guard "was removed from work for failing to assist in this situation" and will no longer be assigned to any of their facilities. 

The vice-president of the security agency Radar Sécurité, Éric Cantin, said the employee did not properly evaluate the situation. "From his point of view, he didn't see the distress in the person's behaviour," he told Radio-Canada.

Dubé said hospital authorities have apologized to the woman and her family and have put in place clarifying measures. 

The hospital says the main entrance is always locked overnight for security reasons and that no other incidents have been reported in relation to this. Patients at that entrance can also communicate with staff through an intercom.

Still, the hospital says it will modify its signs so they clearly indicate to patients where to go when the doors are locked.

---

My comment:  All front entrances of hospitals should be open 24/7. Front entrances are a beacon.  In five minutes a person could be dead. A five-minute WALK...

Never ending ...

I am fed-up with technology, another day, another problem.

I was needing to get some cash to pay for a lawyer and when I inquired how can I borrow money from my credit card, I was told that I had no credit available.  Unbeknown to me in December 2023 the credit card company changed my address for billing from a physical address to on-line.  I was not getting paper statements.  So on top of everything else my source of emergency funds is no longer available.  I need a lawyer and I have no funds

 

 

Tech problems

 I have been having a lot of problems with my tech devices.  Hours and hours are wasted.   I wonder what would happen if the World Wide Web went down.  Civilization as we know it would be over.  

DNR, DNT Orders by Dr. Dunn, VCHA

 I was thinking back to November 2013 when Dr. Dunn put on a DNR and a DNT on Randy.  By accident I found out about the Orders and told Dr. Dunn to remove them (and Randy signed a directive) and he refused.  On the day he should have died and me telling him to take off the DNR/DNT he refused saying that it was not his decision and he would consider it on his return trip from Prince George.  A few hours later my husband was in medical distress and I called 911. Randy was transferred from GPC to Vancouver General Hospital and he survived.  When I allow myself to think about it I get very upset. Dunn wanted him dead. And what did VGH do because I called 911, they banned me from entering George Pearson Centre. Later they banned me from all VCHA properties. How dare I stop a hastened death. They created a horrendous hate against me to justify the bannings. I did not know the extent of the hate until years later i.e. when the manufactured hate came to surface.

DNT means do not transfer from GPC to any hospital

DNR means do not attempt to resuscitate Randy if he has difficulty breathing  He was having difficulty breathing and the staff would not give him oxygen.,

Nothing that has the force of the state behind it is a little law.

https://youtu.be/K5QgPiTXHG8?si=UTYhC7by86rVaGru

"When the power of the state is behind it, there is no such thing as a little law." - Dr. Jordan Peterson, at 23:13.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The ACLU believes that guardianship is the greatest deprivation of civil rights, just after the death penalty. We need transparency so we know who has been deprived.  If you are imprisoned by the state for a crime, the public has a right to know. But, if you are imprisoned by guardianship, the public has no right to know. Go figure!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I came across the words to describe what could be descriptive of why happened to me.  It was/is known as "street-level bureaucracy."  When what happened to me happened, I just discounted it as non-sense.  It was just stupid words, totally irrelevant, so I thought.  Low-level employees made assessments, and these assessments were sanctioned (rubber-stamped) by upper management at Vancouver Coastal Health.  Later when I came to the realization that upper management did not know what was going on, it was obvious that upper management sanctioned whatever lower management said/wanted, upper management had to support their inferiors at my expense.  I believed that when upper management found out what was happening, I would get an apology. But instead, I was cruelly entrapped.  I am now reeking of anger. When it was happening I did not know what they were doing, so it did not brother me.   Can someone tell me what word should be used for this reversal of the chain of command. I was betrayed by the health authority who I trusted.  

I think the term would be :  street bureaucrats.   

Vancouver Coastal Health

I have been thinking about my experience with the health authority when my husband was hospitalized due to his extensive injuries from an accident.

In November I 2010 I was told that I could be banned from seeing my husband, even on his deathbed. No one said I harmed my husband.  I thought the nurse coordinator was crazy and dismissed her threat as nonsense.  However, her threat did come to pass. Not only did Tanu tell me this, but Linda Rose did also.  

Another time was the manager of George Pearson Centre told me that my husband could not change his mind after he talked to me.  Really. There were signs everywhere saying that patients could change their minds anytime.  The health authority from 2010 wanted Randy to agree to a DNR Order.  If Randy had a DNR on him, he would have died in 2010. He died in 2014. But that could have been from a slow code, meaning as he did not have a DNR, they decided not to treat him, which is what they do when they believe that any medical intervention would be a waste of resources.  

Randy was supposed to have died the weekend before, but because I intervened, the woman manager did not know what to do, so she transferred him within one hour (after my lawyer saw Randy) to acute care. It was  Friday, April 4, 2014. But it was too late; the lack of treatment at GPC cemented his death. I was only able to see my husband on his deathbed (he was comatose) after I produced a court order.  Because of the litigation, the ICU lingered his final breath for nine days.  On April 13, 2014, his vent was disconnected, and he slowly died.  It took three hours.  You never forget.  

Do we need a registry of those under the Adult Guardianship Act.

 I asked IA why is it that the public has the right to know who is jail but the public does not have the right to know who is under the BC Adult Guardianship Act.

That is a good question. The answer may depend on different perspectives and values, but I can provide some possible explanations based on the information I found on the web.

One possible explanation is that the names of those who are in jail are public because they have been convicted of a crime and their identity is relevant to the administration of justice and the protection of society. The names of those who have been certified as incapable under the Adult Guardianship Act are private because they have not committed any offence and their identity is not related to any public interest or safety issue. Their privacy and dignity may outweigh the need for transparency in their case.

Another possible explanation is that the names of those who are in jail are public because they have the right to appeal their conviction and sentence, and the public has the right to know the outcome of their case. The names of those who have been certified as incapable under the Adult Guardianship Act are private because they have limited or no legal capacity to challenge or consent to their guardianship, and the public has no legitimate interest or right to interfere with their personal affairs.

There may be other reasons or arguments for or against the disclosure of the names of those who are in jail or those who are under guardianship. Ultimately, the decision to make the names public or private is based on the law and the court's discretion, which may vary depending on the circumstances of each case.

If a government agency can relocate an adult without a registry then we have no security of person in Canada. How many people have disappeared in BC.  The AGA is worse than the Mental Health Act.

PS December 15, 2023.  Is privacy used to hide corruption (not doing the right thing) by the health authorities (government).  Not knowing what happens to citizens is mental abuse/torture.  Once a person's rights are taken away from them by way of the AGA or by an individual by way of a representation agreement, it is no longer a private matter.  The affected person is being sold into slavery.  I want my neighbour to know if the state hasrelocated me.  The reasoning that someone might exploit me is ridiculous.  I want my neighbour to know so he can help me.  

Representation Agreements for health care in BC

 I am trying to learn about the history of Representation Agreements in BC.  They must be someone but I have not been able to find out if there is anyone totally conversant with a RA.  I want to know what are the downsides of a Representation Agreement.  Appointing a person you trust is a daunting task.  In fact I would say it is impossible.  Blatant abuse screams out by letting an inexperienced person make decisions for health care and where a person can live.  

Maya Kowalski sobs as verdict is reached in trial

Waldemar's American Road Trip: Big Dreams, Big Art | Made In The USA: Fu...

Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood

 I recently came across this song "Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood."  It is exactly what I feel has happened to me in my sojourn to understand what happened to me because I only wanted to be with my husband when he was ill and VCH refused to accommodate us.  There was never any suggestion that I abused my husband so I do not know what the problem was. It just escalated into a reverse SLAP suit where everyone was afraid.  I suspect it is over the perceived power that VCH might have over the lives of their children and grandchildren.  As bizarre as it was and still is.  It is even worse now with all this politically correct wokeness. As I search for answers, I feel that I have been purpled dotted by those that can offer answers but prefer not to. 

From my post 20 March 2014: the PGT knew Randy was dying and it would not intervene so I could see him. They instead revoked my enduring power of attorney and section 9 representation agreement.

 

Thursday, March 20, 2014

Randy Sick

Audrey Laferriere audreyjlaferriere@gmail.com	7:54 AM (0 minutes ago)
to Romilda, Tanvirezohra

I understand Randy is feeling better today so I want to see him at the curbside at 1:30 pm.  I also want a written statement given to me of his vitals on each day from now on. I will attend at the curbside each day to get it. If I cannot see him at the crubside each day then I want access to his bedside as he may be dying as it takes only a short time for a fever to pitch and cause death.
 You have a mother in extended care, how would you feel if you couldn't see her.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I got an email from Ro Ang yesterday that said I could not see Randy at the curbside i.e. off GPC property because Randy had a temperature and she won't let Randy see me.  Randy always has a fever it is part of his base line after his accident.  I replied and said  if Randy has a fever that he can't get out of bed and be transported to the curbside (off GPC property) then I want to see him at his bedside. No response.  Dr. Dunne signs an affidavit saying Randy has plateaued and now Randy is too sick because of a low grade fever to see me.

In any event I went to the sidewalk in front of GPC with a sign that I was banned from seeing Randy who is dying by GPC because staff is afraid of me.  I was hoping that staff or someone would be a witness and tell Ro that this isn't true.

As for our friend Kevin the security guard with a title he is writing policy for VCH.his report says that he interviewed only eight people:
.
Romilda Ang, Manager George Pearson Centre
Tanvireozohra Battawala, Resident CARE COODINATOR GEORGE Person Centre
Karen Marshall, Paladin Security Officer, George Pearson Centre
Bob Van Uytfanck, Paladin Security Officer, Supervisor George Pearson Centre
Richard Singleton, Director Risk Management, Vancovuer Community
Terru Asj. :ead Cpprdomatpr. Omtegrated {rptectopm Servoces. Vancouver Copastal Health
Dr. George Nemetz, Private Psychologist, Critical Incident Stress Debrief Facilator
Sam Greenspoon, Social Worker (George Person C

Officer Marshall described Ms. Laferriere as extremely upset and observed her attempting to "hot or run over" staff with Mr. Walker's electronic wheelchair.  Clinicial staff atttempted to stop Ms. Laferriere from holding Mr. Walker's wheelchair.  This from a professional observer who should have known that I and Randy had the right to leave George Pearson Centre at anytime.  She as well as the rest of the mob assaulted me and imprisoned Randy and me.  But then Kevin's report doesn't say anything about that.

NOTE:  Randy does not have an electronic wheelchair which I agree could be used as a dangerous vehicle considering how heavy these wheelchairs are.  They twist everything.  The point is they created the situation not me.  And this whole thing has nothing to do with what happened on October 22, 2013, it has everything to do with the fact that management doesn't want me near the hospital so I can report on any medical misadventures like putinig DNRs on residents without their knowledge or reporting that the heart monitor machines were not calibrated thereby causing risk a real risk to Randy and other patients.  They want to cover up everything because he may die at anytime and GPC doesn't have the staff to monitor him continuously or even the skill as to how hat they would do if his heart rate reached over 155 again.  They are not experienced in agressive resuscitation or have cardiac drugs to lower his heart rate.  I asked that they have a nurse 24/7 with him but they refused and they also refuse to have me be at his bedside.  They are cruel and another medical adventure is waiting to happen to Randy.

It was Kevin  who put the words into Richard Singleton's letter to deny me access to Randy:

1.  all questions from Mrs. Laferriere should be directed to the Resident Care Coordinator (rather than to the nurses who nurse Randy).
2.  Two staff present when interacting with Ms. Laferriere (what a joke, suggesting that I attack the nurses)
3.  Priorize staff safety (Staff have always been safe except when they broke the law and caused violence  October 22 2013 incident wherein the staff attacked me and Randy).
4.  Call 911 or security for support as appropriate (It has always been me who phoned 911 to protect Randy's rights from unlawful confinement)
5. Specific visiting hours and he later he says I should never be allowed on VCH property so how can I visit Randy
6.  Not to go beyond Mr. Walker's rooom (considering they moved him to a ward, he doesn't have a room)
7.  Not to visit other residents or family at GPC (I have been prevented free speech and association).  There is no affidavits from any resident, family, or staff to say that they agree with this.

All these recommendations are contained in the two letters that Richard Singleton wrote me. And as soon as I learn how to scan them I will post them.

Chinese Doctors, nurses & medical sectors are in panic/Crackdown on corruption. Mostly because of private hospitals.

Decision in Dr Jordan Peterson Freedom of Expression case

That makes no sense.

 How I see the system

from a prisoner:

“But that makes no sense,” I wanted to say, but didn’t. After my time in the system I no longer expected anything to make sense."

The Dirty War on Britain's NHS (Free Healthcare Scandal Documentary) | R...

So You Want To Take My License?

Do you have privacy if you are dead

 According to the constitution, we have the right to life, liberty and security of person.  If a person is dead or declared a non-person, that person has no right to privacy.   Once you are dead, you no longer need security of person. 

Thus, if a person is physically dead or is a non-person (civil death) then there would be no reason for agencies like the public guardian and trustee not to share contact information.  I want to know if my neighbour is vulnerable.

And, once a person is said to be incapable under an enduring power of attorney and/or a section 9 representation agreement, the person is civilly dead and he has no right to privacy. 

The banks monitor their clients for abuse and so should neighbours.  

I would like to know if my neighbour has agency.  A non-person cannot make a contract.  

My definition of "neighbour" means globally.  

With privacy comes the death of historians:  how can history be written without access to information.

Court Ordered Committee or Committee by Certificate of Incapability

 I find the Court Ordered Committee and Committee by Certificate of Incapability very confusing.

It seems that a Court Ordered Committee has transparency, but the Certificate of Incapability does not.

There is something inherently wrong with the Certificate of Incapability process.  It reminds me of the process the Star Chamber Courts followed in England centuries ago.  Decisions were made in secrecy without due process and with no appeal. The tribunal was allowed to torture an accused but not kill him, much like giving morphine to a patient but not killing him.  But if you torture an accused too much or if you give a patient too much morphine, they will die.  

The Public Guardian and Trustee does an investigation, makes a recommendation, sends it to a health authority designate (an employee of VCHA), and after reading the recommendation, the HAD signs the certificate, probably from the bottom of his "to-do list." The subjected person becomes a nonperson, and the Public Guardian and Trustee becomes the committee of this now nonperson who before was a person. What happens to the nonperson if he was relocated...I do not know, and there is no way for the public to know, as such information is confidential.

Under privacy, the public is not entitled to know.  In New Zealand, identifying those under guardianship is against the law.  And the person elected cannot identify himself. And the press is gagged. It must be the same in British Columbia. These evils must be replicated in other jurisdictions.  

I remember when Randy, my husband, was being relocated by VGH to a long care facility, no one at VCH would tell me what happened to him.  I still remember the terror of not knowing. From the day of his accident and for six months, I visited Randy every day. Never had a problem.  When I approached the nursing station, the eight nurses at the nursing station looked down at me as if they enjoyed watching me being in a state of confusion and terror. Not one of them broke rank and told me.  And they all knew. Again it was privacy.  It was against policy to tell where a patient was being transferred to. The nurses did not tell me that it was a privacy/policy thing. It was cruel. And what would have happened to anyone of them if one of them told me. Nothing. The absurdity of privacy.  It harms.  It does not protect. It isolates.  It drove me to the edge of madness.

My mind went back to the first time I spoke with a social worker at VGH, it was the end of her shift, and she was in a hurry to leave.  Her words to me were to forget about Randy as they would look after him. And she ran out the door. Who were they? And who was she? From that moment on, I became inwardly afraid but I did not know why. The social worker's foregone conclusion was based on arrogant stupidity. Later I learned that a social worker is an officer of the court, and I was right to be apprehensive.

No privacy when you are a non-person (incapable)

 When the state decides that a person is incapable, thus making the person a non-person, I want to know who that person is. That person has to be protected by the community at large.

 A non-person is a person that has no rights. Alluding that a non-person has rights is a fiction. It is a civil death. 

And according to common law, a non-person has no right to privacy, so there is no reason not to publish their names.  

-----

Why the public guardian and trustee should publish names of those that are incapable

 How would anyone know if a person is incapable to contract (have agency) unless there is a register published by the Public Guardian and Trustee available to the public.  

Adult Guardianship Act BC

Transfer of property by incapable adult

60.2   (1)If an adult transfers an interest in the adult's property while the adult is incapable, the transfer is voidable against the adult unless

(a)the interest was transferred for full and valuable consideration, and that consideration was actually paid or secured to the adult, or

(b)at the time of the transfer, a reasonable person would not have known that the adult was incapable.

(2)In a proceeding in respect of a transfer described in subsection (1), the onus of proving a matter described in subsection (1) (b) is on the person to whom the interest was transferred.

Guardianship: Life under the hidden control of the Public Trustee system in Australia.

Privacy again

This past week I spoke with two persons who like me had troubles with the health authorities a decade ago. Each of us experienced trauma because Vancouver Health Authority would not share information with us.  If the health authority thinks you are discrediting them, there is no help. Not from the media, not from physicians, not from advocacy organizations, nothing.  A reporter told they would not run my story as I would be harmed. If you have no money for lawyers, then they will show you the door.  And if you have money, they take your money until you have none and then show you the door.  Resources are limited and the law deters to the health authorities. Think a trusted person would never molest a child.  At the end you only have regret and silent anger. The pattern of their behavior is so obvious, like they are following a flow chart.  When my litigation was dismissed because my lawyer did not follow the rules, and I could not represent myself; the lawyers for VCH et al, all rejoiced in the courtroom leaving me bewildered. And the judge did not condemn them for their mal behavior.But then in her hurried departure, maybe she did not notice. Neither did she entertain my plea for an adjournment. Granting an adjournment would not have been necessary if the litigators for the health authority et al would have consented.  Why would VCHA want the litigation dismissed. You would think they would welcome transparency and an open forum. 

  

Relocation by the State

Stats re those that have been involutarily taken (Mental Health Act).

 "Further, of those 1,468 patient files, only 471 contained a Notification to Near Relative (Form 16). This is a compliance rate of about 32 percent. In other words, based on the information provided to us, the parents, siblings, children or other near relatives of 997 involuntary patients admitted in British Columbia in June 2017 did not receive the required formal notice that their family member had been involuntarily admitted or, importantly, the information about that person’s right to challenge their detention."   

Why

Why should you do the right thing when you do not have to.

The answer is within

Listen to "Your Consent is Not Required with Rob Wipond Part 2"